2010 North Rhine-Westphalia state election

German state election
2010 North Rhine-Westphalia state election

← 2005 9 May 2010 2012 →

All 181 seats in the Landtag of North Rhine-Westphalia
91 seats needed for a majority
Turnout7,870,412 (59.3% Decrease 3.7pp)
  First party Second party Third party
 
Candidate Jürgen Rüttgers Hannelore Kraft Sylvia Löhrmann
Party CDU SPD Greens
Last election 89 seats, 44.8% 74 seats, 37.1% 12 seats, 6.2%
Seats won 67 67 23
Seat change Decrease 22 Decrease 7 Increase 11
Popular vote 2,681,700 2,675,818 941,162
Percentage 34.6% 34.5% 12.1%
Swing Decrease 10.3pp Decrease 2.6pp Increase 5.9pp

  Fourth party Fifth party
 
Candidate Andreas Pinkwart Bärbel Beuermann
Party FDP Left
Last election 12 seats, 6.2% 0 seats, 3.1%[a]
Seats won 13 11
Seat change Increase 1 Increase 11
Popular vote 522,229 435,627
Percentage 6.7% 5.6%
Swing Increase 0.5pp Increase 2.5pp

Results for the single-member constituencies.

Government before election

Rüttgers cabinet
CDU–FDP

Government after election

First Kraft cabinet
SPD–Green

The 2010 North Rhine-Westphalia state election was held on 9 May 2010 to elect the 15th Landtag of North Rhine-Westphalia. The outgoing government was a coalition of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and Free Democratic Party (FDP) led by Minister-President Jürgen Rüttgers.

The election was a defeat for the incumbent government, but failed to produce a clear outcome. The CDU suffered its worst-ever result, falling over ten percentage points to just 34.6%. The opposition Social Democratic Party (SPD) led by Hannelore Kraft also recorded a decline and finished just 0.1% behind the CDU; both parties tied on 67 seats. The Greens recorded their best result to date with 12%, while the FDP achieved a small swing to 6.7%. The newly-formed Left party won 5.6% and 11 seats. Neither the incumbent CDU–FDP government (80 seats) or prospective SDP–Green coalition (90 seats) achieved a majority in the Landtag, with The Left narrowly holding balance of power.

Complex talks took place between all five parties, with the CDU and SPD each aiming for a coalition with the Greens and FDP, or a grand coalition between the two of them. The SPD and Greens also held talks with The Left. All discussions ended without success by mid-June. On the 17th, the SPD and Greens announced they would attempt to form a minority government led by Hannelore Kraft. They ruled out a confidence arrangement with The Left, but nonetheless relied on the party's abstention for the government's investiture to succeed. Kraft was elected Minister-President on 14 July on the second ballot, which required only a simple majority, with 90 votes in favour, 80 against, and eleven abstentions.

Electoral system

The Landtag is elected via mixed-member proportional representation. 128 members are elected in single-member constituencies via first-past-the-post voting. 53 members are then allocated using compensatory proportional representation. Voters have two votes: the "first vote" for candidates in single-member constituencies, and the "second vote" for party lists, which are used to fill the remaining seats in a way that achieves proportionality overall. The minimum size of the Landtag is 181 members, but if overhang seats are present, proportional leveling seats will be added to ensure proportionality. An electoral threshold of 5% of valid votes is applied to the Landtag; parties that fall below this threshold are ineligible to receive seats.[1] This was the first state election in which voters had two votes.

Background

In the previous election held on 22 May 2005, the SPD suffered a landslide defeat and was ousted from government for the first time since 1966. They received only 37% of votes while the CDU emerged in a strong first place with almost 45%; the FDP and Greens each took 6%. The CDU and FDP subsequently formed a coalition government under Jürgen Rüttgers.

Parties

A sample ballot for the Solingen I constituency, showcasing the new voting system.

The table below lists parties represented in the 14th Landtag of North Rhine-Westphalia.

Name Ideology Lead
candidate
2005 result
Votes (%) Seats
CDU Christian Democratic Union of Germany
Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
Christian democracy Jürgen Rüttgers 44.8%
89 / 187
SPD Social Democratic Party of Germany
Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands
Social democracy Hannelore Kraft 37.1%
74 / 187
GRÜNE Alliance 90/The Greens
Bündnis 90/Die Grünen
Green politics Sylvia Löhrmann 6.2%
12 / 187
FDP Free Democratic Party
Freie Demokratische Partei
Classical liberalism Andreas Pinkwart 6.2%
12 / 187

A total of 25 parties ran state lists in the election. Due to the newly-introduced two vote system, parties were able to stand their lists on ballots statewide without running candidates in every constituency, as had been the case previously. 1,000 signatures were required for a party to run a state list. In addition to the parties running lists, some stood only constituency candidates. A number of independent candidates also ran.

Campaign

An SPD campaign event in Duisburg with Bärbel Bas (first from the left) and Andrea Nahles (third from the left)
Sylvia Löhrmann addressing media on a tram during the campaign
An FDP campaign stand in Bocholt on election day

Education policy was an important topic in the election campaign. The government wanted to retain the existing three-tier school system, and pointed out that during their tenure attendance had improved and many new teaching positions had been created. The opposition criticised the state's poor performance in PISA studies, and campaigned for the establishment of schools which integrated more younger and older students to improve efficiency, as well as the abolition of tuition fees.[2]

The CDU was embroiled in a financing scandal in the lead up to the campaign, with companies accused of paying bribes in exchange for meetings with Minister-President Rüttgers. A Bundestag investigation found no violation of party finance laws.[3] Shortly before the election, another scandal surfaced in which the CDU was accused of covertly commissioning a voters' initiative from a non-partisan communications agency, with the fundraising money allegedly used to pay for pro-Rüttgers newspaper ads under non-party branding.[4] The allegations were sourced from intercepted emails from the NRW CDU and published mostly anonymously online. The CDU lodged a complaint with the state prosecutor over data breaches, but attributed the accusations to a malicious defamation campaign.[5]

Federal issues also impacted the campaign. A new federal coalition of the CDU and FDP had taken office about six months earlier. If the state government was defeated, the federal government would lose its majority in the Bundesrat, the upper house whose members mirror the composition of each state government. This could prevent the government from implementing some of its proposed projects, including a controversial possible extension to the lifespan of some nuclear power plants, which the SPD and Greens pointed out.[6] The federal government also delayed releasing its tax and budget plans until after the state election, which was widely criticised as a political play to avoid backlash from anticipated spending cuts.[7] Just a few weeks before the election, the government also agreed to help finance a €110 billion EU bailout of the Greek government-debt crisis.

The Left also campaigned heavily on federal issues, criticising the social policy of both the federal CDU and former SPD governments, ongoing German involvement in the War in Afghanistan, and the consequences of the Global Financial Crisis.[8] Despite being mostly a federal responsibility, employment and labour policy were also an important issue in the election; the left-wing opposition parties called for the establishment of a minimum wage, which the CDU and FDP opposed. Both Rüttgers and Kraft distanced themselves from controversial federal social policy such as the Hartz IV programme.[9]

Polls ahead of the election indicated that The Left was likely to enter the Landtag, while the two major parties were likely to suffer losses collectively. This continued the trend in recent years of dwindling support for the traditional parties and an increasingly fractured parliamentary landscape with difficult majorities. The FDP was the only party to commit to a single option to the exclusion of all others: a continuation of the incumbent government. The CDU also campaigned to continue the coalition, but left the option of cooperation with the Greens open. The SPD expressed a preference for a coalition with the Greens but otherwise refused to draw hard lines. The Greens favoured the SPD, but likewise did not rule out working with the CDU. Relations with The Left were a sticking point: the CDU and FDP viewed cooperation as impossible, while the Greens and SPD left their options more open. However, the Greens did rule out a confidence and supply arrangement, and the SPD regularly denounced them as incapable of governing. For their part, The Left stated their willingness to join a coalition with the SPD and Greens and support Hannelore Kraft as Minister-President.[10]

Opinion polling

Polling firm Fieldwork date Sample
size
CDU SPD Grüne FDP Linke Others Lead
2010 state election 9 May 2010 34.6 34.5 12.1 6.7 5.6 6.5 0.1
YouGov 30 Apr–6 May 2010 1,007 35 35.5 10.5 7 7 5 0.5
Emnid 28 Apr–5 May 2010 1,000 37 33 12 8 5 5 4
Forsa 3–5 May 2010 1,005 37 37 10 6 5 5 Tie
GMS 3–4 May 2010 1,001 37 33 12 7 6 5 4
Emnid 21–29 Apr 2010 1,033 38 33 11 8 6 4 5
Forschungsgruppe Wahlen 27–29 Apr 2010 1,080 35 33.5 11 8.5 6 6 1.5
Infratest dimap 27–29 Apr 2010 1,000 37.5 33 10 7.5 5.5 4.5 4.5
Forsa 19–23 Apr 2010 1,004 39 33 10 7 6 5 6
Emnid 12–20 Apr 2010 1,038 38 34 11 8 6 3 4
OmniQuest 19–22 Apr 2010 1,000 37.5 36.8 12.8 5.1 4.8 2.9 0.7
Forsa 12–17 Apr 2010 1,009 38 34 9 8 6 5 4
Forsa 6–9 Apr 2010 1,003 39 34 11 6 5 5 5
Infratest dimap 7–10 Apr 2010 1,000 38 34 12 7 6 3 4
GMS 5–6 Apr 2010 1,002 39 32 12 7 6 4 7
Emnid 15–31 Mar 2010 1,047 38 32 12 8 7 3 6
Emnid 18–22 Mar 2010 996 38 32 11 8 7 4 6
Forschungsgruppe Wahlen 15–17 Mar 2010 1,091 37 33 12 8 6 4 4
Emnid 5–11 Mar 2010 1,000 37 33 12 8 7 3 4
Infratest dimap 1–3 Mar 2010 1,000 35 33 13 10 6 3 2
Forsa 22–26 Feb 2010 1,016 38 34 11 6 6 5 4
GMS 18–20 Feb 2010 1,003 39 31 12 7 6 5 8
Forsa 20–29 Jan 2010 1,047 41 32 11 6 5 5 9
Infratest dimap 19–21 Jan 2010 1,000 36 32 12 9 6 5 4
Forsa 4–15 Jan 2010 1,121 42 31 11 6 5 5 11
Infratest dimap 17–19 Nov 2009 1,000 36 30 11 10 8 5 6
Forsa 2–13 Nov 2009 1,022 41 31 9 9 6 4 10
GMS 21–28 Jul 2009 1,002 39 29 9 12 5 6 10
Infratest dimap 10–11 Jun 2009 1,000 38 27 12 14 6 3 11
Forsa 13–30 Apr 2009 1,283 42 30 8 11 5 4 12
Infratest dimap 24–26 Feb 2009 1,000 40 28 10 12 7 3 12
Forsa 19–30 Jan 2009 1,078 42 26 9 13 6 4 16
Emnid 29 Jan 2009 ? 38 30 9 12 9 ? 8
Infratest dimap 8–9 Oct 2008 1,000 37 30 10 12 9 2 7
Forsa 24 Sep–2 Oct 2008 1,017 41 30 8 10 7 4 11
Forsa 31 Jul–12 Aug 2008 970 44 27 8 10 7 4 17
Forsa 21–30 Jul 2008 867 42 30 8 10 6 4 12
Forsa 26 May–6 Jun 2008 1,054 44 27 8 9 8 4 17
Forsa 5–16 May 2008 1,216 42 29 9 9 7 4 13
Forsa 17–28 Mar 2008 1,386 43 29 8 8 8 4 14
Infratest dimap 25–27 Mar 2008 1,000 41 31 10 9 6 3 10
Emnid 25–28 Feb 2008 1,000 41 32 8 8 8 ? 9
Forsa 28 Jan–5 Feb 2008 1,014 42 33 6 8 7 4 9
Emnid 2 Feb 2008 ? 39 35 8 9 6 3 4
Infratest dimap 6–8 Nov 2007 1,000 40 34 8 9 6 3 6
Emnid 2–8 Nov 2007 1,000 40 33 8 9 7 3 7
Forsa 22 Oct–5 Nov 2007 1,418 45 31 7 7 6 4 14
Forsa 30 Aug–11 Sep 2007 1,157 44 29 8 8 6 5 15
Emnid 31 Jul–4 Aug 2007 1,000 38 31 9 11 8 3 7
Infratest dimap 31 Jul–2 Aug 2007 1,000 38 35 9 9 6 3 3
Emnid 23–28 Apr 2007 1,000 39 32 11 12 6 7
Emnid 2–5 Mar 2007 1,000 38 33 12 11 6 5
Emnid 4–16 Jan 2007 1,000 39 33 11 12 3 2 6
Infratest dimap 9–11 Jan 2007 1,000 38 36 9 9 4 4 2
Forsa 17 Oct 2006 1,932 41 31 8 11 5 4 10
Emnid 11–12 Aug 2006 1,000 40 34 9 9 3 5 6
Infratest dimap 8–10 Aug 2006 1,000 39 35 9 10 4 3 4
Forsa 10–18 Jul 2006 1,055 43 32 7 10 5 3 11
GMS 12–14 May 2006 1,001 42 38 7 7 3 3 4
Infratest dimap 16–18 May 2006 1,000 43 34 6 10 4 3 9
Forsa 8–16 May 2006 1,001 41 33 8 9 5 4 8
Emnid 8–12 May 2006 1,002 40 35 7 8 4 6 5
Infratest dimap 13–15 Dec 2005 1,000 42 36 8 7 4 3 6
Infratest dimap 16–18 Aug 2005 1,000 45 34 7 6 5 3 11
2005 state election 22 May 2005 44.8 37.1 6.2 6.2 3.1[b] 2.6 7.7

Results

Due to the electoral reform that took place in this election, no swing is given for the constituency vote except for independents. Swing values for the party list vote are compared to the single vote from the 2005 election.

11
67
23
13
67
PartyConstituencyParty listTotal
seats
+/–
Votes%+/–SeatsVotes%+/–Seats
Christian Democratic Union (CDU)2,983,78838.54672,681,70034.56–10.28067–22
Social Democratic Party (SPD)2,980,31138.50612,675,81834.48–2.63667–7
Alliance 90/The Greens (GRÜNE)784,82610.140941,16212.13+5.952323+11
Free Democratic Party (FDP)363,8954.700522,2296.73+0.561313+1
The Left (LINKE)415,2415.360435,6275.61+2.511111+11
Pirate Party Germany (Piraten)70,6100.91New0121,0461.56New00New
Citizens' Movement pro NRW (Pro NRW)67,3100.87New0107,4761.38New00New
National Democratic Party (NPD)24,6850.32055,4000.71–0.1900±0
Human Environment Animal Protection (Tierschutzpartei)5,0930.07048,0990.62+0.5500±0
Pensioners' Party (Rentner)7,0980.09New038,4230.50New00New
Family Party of Germany (FAMILIE)8,1680.11031,7580.41+0.3600±0
The Republicans (REP)4,8760.06023,3300.30–0.5200±0
Alliance for Innovation and Justice (BIG)2,8320.04New013,8630.18New00New
Party of Bible-abiding Christians (PBC)2320.0009,4160.12+0.0400±0
Die PARTEI4730.0109,2470.12+0.1000±0
From now... Alliance for Germany Party1,4870.02New07,7870.10New00New
Ecological Democratic Party (ÖDP)2,7700.0407,5050.10–0.0900±0
Free Citizens Initiative/Free Voters (FBI)5120.01New06,6360.09New00New
Centre Party (ZENTRUM)2,9870.0405,9760.08+0.0600±0
The Violets (VIOLETTEN)1960.00New05,9680.08New00New
Party for Labour, Environment and Family (AUF)2,4020.03New05,1730.07New00New
Civil Rights Movement Solidarity (BüSo)7,1640.0903,3700.04–0.0400±0
Free Union (FU)5760.01New01,4430.02New00New
German Democratic Party (DDP)1,4220.02New00New
League for All-Germany (BGD)150.0006720.01+0.0100±0
Social Centre7540.01New00New
The Westphalians4730.01New00New
Social Justice North Rhine-Westphalia (SG-NRW)3470.00New00New
German Communist Party (DKP)1970.00New00New
Independent Workers' Party (UAP)1080.0000±0
Ecological Left (ÖkoLinX)1000.0000±0
Liberal Democrats (LD)950.0000±0
German Party (DP)670.00New00New
Independents2,2670.03–0.0300±0
Total7,741,955100.001287,760,546100.0053181–6
Valid votes7,741,95598.377,760,54698.60
Invalid/blank votes128,4571.63109,8661.40
Total votes7,870,412100.007,870,412100.00
Registered voters/turnout13,267,05259.3213,267,05259.32
Source: [1]

Aftermath

Analysis

Exit polling by Forschungsgruppe Wahlen indicated that state politics was primary for most voters. 55% said it was most important in their voting decision, while 41% said federal politics was more important, and only 15% said their vote was a protest against the federal government. An overwhelming majority of voters (78%) named education as an important issue, alongside the Greek debt crisis (56%). Only 38% considered CDU finance scandals important. According to Infratest dimap polling, economic development, education, and budget deficits were the most important issues. The SPD was considered more competent in the areas of education and social welfare, while the CDU led in economics and finance. Compared to the 2005 election, while the issue of employment lost salience, perception of the SPD's competence in the area recovered while the CDU's declined.

Jürgen Rüttgers had particularly poor personal ratings. Forschungsgruppe Wahlen found that only 40% of voters preferred him as Minister-President compared to 43% for Hannelore Kraft, an unusual result in Germany where incumbents are typically favoured over challengers, even in close elections. Kraft was rated as more persuasive, sympathetic, and in-touch. Nonetheless, a majority of voters placed more importance on programme and policy when voting, with only one-sixth choosing the lead candidates as the decisive factor. The CDU and SPD did poorly among young voters, who voted strongly for the Greens and non-parliamentary minor parties. Voters over 60 gave much more support to the major parties, particularly the CDU.[11][12][13][14]

Government formation

The incumbent CDU–FDP government lost its majority by a wide margin, taking 80 of the 181 seats. However, a prospective SPD–Green coalition came up just one seat short of a majority with 90 seats of the 91 required. There were four plausible majority coalitions: a grand coalition between the CDU and SPD (134 seats), a CDU–Green–FDP "Jamaica" coalition or SPD–Green–FDP "traffic light" coalition (both 103 seats), or an SPD–Green–Left "red-green-red" coalition (101 seats). The CDU aimed for a Jamaica coalition or grand coalition, while the SPD hoped, in order of preference, for a traffic light, red-green-red, or grand coalition.[15]

The prospect of a grand coalition was complicated by the extremely narrow margin of the election: both major parties took 67 seats in the Landtag, and the question of who would serve as Minister-President was disputed. Rüttgers insisted he would continue in office since the CDU won more votes than the SPD, while Kraft insisted that she should take over given the harsh losses of the CDU.[16]

The SPD first approached the Greens for discussions, with the intention of then seeking a third partner – either the FDP or Left, with a preference for the former. On the morning of the 14th, they sent invitations to both. The Left accepted, but the FDP declined, with leader Andreas Pinkwart stating: "The offer from the SPD and the Greens obviously lacks any seriousness, otherwise the Left Party would not have been invited on the same day. ... The traffic light and Jamaica are no longer coalition options."[17] After the first meeting between the SPD–Green bloc and Left on the 20th, Hannelore Kraft announced that talks had been unsuccessful. She cited problematic sentiments about East Germany and a lack of willingness to take responsibility by The Left as factors. The SPD then invited the CDU to talks for a grand coalition, while the Greens withdrew in the expectation that they would remain in opposition.[18]

After three rounds of meetings, the SPD withdrew from talks on 2 June citing a lack of compromise from the CDU. Kraft said they were unwilling to change policy or personnel, while Rüttgers insisted that only a few contentious issues remained. The previous day, the FDP had reversed their position and announced they were open to talks for a traffic light coalition.[19] The three parties met on 8 June, and again on the 10th for about ten hours. The next day, the FDP announced that talks had failed: they had not been able to reconcile their positions, most especially with the Greens on education policy, and felt the demands of the SPD and Greens were too harsh.[20] On 12 June, after a one-on-one meeting between Rüttgers and Kraft about a grand coalition, the SPD executive voted not to pursue further coalition options and instead withdraw into opposition. Kraft said that they would attempt to garner majorities for legislation on the floor of the Landtag.[21] This was received poorly by the other parties, including the Greens, who called for a minority government.

On 17 June, the SPD reversed its position and Kraft announced that they would indeed attempt to form a minority government with the Greens. Shortly before, FDP leader Pinkwart had told the Westdeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung that the coalition between the CDU and FDP had run its course, and that his party would push for "majority decisions in the interest of the state" in the Landtag. Reportedly, the SPD leadership saw this as the effective end of Rüttgers' government, which had been operating in a caretaker capacity since the election, and strengthened the likelihood of investing an SPD minority government.[22] Though they hoped for cooperation from the FDP, the party executive unanimously decided on 22 June to vote against Kraft in the investiture and oppose a red-green government.[23]

Minority governments are possible in North Rhine-Westphalia due to the procedure for electing the Minister-President: the initial hurdle for election is an absolute majority (a majority of all members) in favour, but after a certain number of failed ballots it is reduced to a simple majority (a majority of all votes cast). Since the SPD and Greens together held more seats than the CDU and FDP, they would be able to win so long as The Left abstained. The SPD and Greens did not consult The Left and rejected suggestions that they were relying on them, but once they FDP made it clear that they would vote against Kraft, they did tacitly require tolerance from The Left or their government would fail. The SPD and Greens quickly concluded a coalition agreement, with both parties ratifying it on 10 July.

The investiture took place on 14 July. Hannelore Kraft, proposed by the SPD and Greens, was the only candidate. In the first ballot, she received 90 votes in favour, 81 against, and ten abstentions, suggesting that one Left deputy voted against. The second ballot required only a simple majority. Kraft was elected with 90 votes in favour, 80 against, and eleven abstentions.[24]

Landtag

The new Landtag met for its inaugural session on 9 June. By convention, the largest party nominates the presiding officer (President of the Landtag), but the tie in seats between the CDU and SPD made it unclear who had the right. The two parties were also concerned that the selection of the president could affect the outcome of government negotiations. They agreed to put off the question by exploiting a constitutional loophole: if no new presiding officer is elected at the inaugural session, the outgoing president from the previous term remains in office. They convened the council of elders of the previous Landtag to remove the election of the presiding officer from the agenda of the inaugural session, claiming there were no applicants. Outgoing president Regina van Dinther (CDU) thus remained in office and chaired the inaugural session. However, she had lost her seat in the election and resigned the presidency effective at the conclusion of the 9 June session. The office thus passed to outgoing first vice-president Edgar Moron (SPD), who had also lost his seat; though he was no longer a member of the Landtag, he served acting president until 17 July, when Eckhard Uhlenberg (CDU) was finally elected. This situation was harshly criticised in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung by Patrick Bahners, who labeled it an act of "self-rejection" contrary to the principles of democracy.[25]

External links

  • "Electoral system of North Rhine-Westphalia". Wahlrecht.de (in German). 15 May 2022. Retrieved 22 February 2023.

References

  1. ^ "State Election Law". Recht.nrw.de. Retrieved 12 May 2021.
  2. ^ "Debate about the school system: Left behind in NRW". Süddeutsche Zeitung (in German). 21 May 2010.
  3. ^ "Rüttgers admits political damage: Reactions to the sponsorship affair". Westdeutscher Rundfunk (in German). 23 February 2010. Archived from the original on 25 February 2010.
  4. ^ "New donation scandal harms Rüttgers". Handelsblatt (in German). 3 May 2010.
  5. ^ "CDU: Data theft in NRW - Rüttgers chases the mole". Süddeutsche Zeitung (in German). 3 March 2010. Archived from the original on 5 May 2010.
  6. ^ "NRW shakeup election endangers major projects for black-yellow". Der Spiegel (in German). 6 May 2010.
  7. ^ "The day the bill came". Süddeutsche Zeitung (in German). 21 May 2010.
  8. ^ "Suddenly on government course". Die Welt (in German). 16 April 2010.
  9. ^ "A double press conference called TV duel". Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (in German). 27 April 2010.
  10. ^ "Colour games to the end: state election in NRW". Stern (in German). 5 May 2010.
  11. ^ "Black and yellow voted out record losses for the CDU" (PDF). Forschungsgruppe Wahlen (in German). 9 May 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 November 2014.
  12. ^ "Voters are running away from the major parties". Tagesschau (in German). 10 May 2010. Archived from the original on 11 May 2010.
  13. ^ "Analysis of the election researchers: Rüttgers alienated the voters". Der Spiegel (in German). 9 May 2010.
  14. ^ "Election analysis NRW: No more power on the Rhine". Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (in German). 10 May 2010.
  15. ^ "SPD tries the Kraft act". N-tv.de (in German). 10 May 2010.
  16. ^ "Parties throw off their taboos". n24.de (in German). 10 May 2010. Archived from the original on 16 December 2012.
  17. ^ "New chance for red-red-green". Die Tageszeitung (in German). 15 May 2010.
  18. ^ "No red-red-green coalition in NRW". Westdeutscher Rundfunk (in German). 20 May 2010. Archived from the original on 17 December 2012.
  19. ^ "SPD and CDU part with no agreement". Die Zeit (in German). 2 June 2010.
  20. ^ "Traffic light coalition in NRW off the table: "The happiest funeral I've ever attended"". Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (in German). 11 June 2010.
  21. ^ "NRW SPD wants to remain in opposition". Rheinische Post (in German). 12 June 2010. Archived from the original on 15 June 2010.
  22. ^ "Red-Green plans minority government in NRW". Der Spiegel (in German). 17 June 2010.
  23. ^ "SPD and Greens are optimistic". Der Spiegel (in German). 22 June 2010.
  24. ^ "Hannelore Kraft elected Minister-President". Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (in German). 14 July 2010.
  25. ^ "Self-rejection in Düsseldorf". Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (in German). 11 June 2010.

Notes

  1. ^ Aggregated results for WASG (2.2%) and PDS (0.9%).
  2. ^ Results for WASG (2.2%) and PDS (0.9%).
  • v
  • t
  • e
State electionsLippe stateLocal elections
  • 1946
  • 1948
  • 1952
  • 1956
  • 1961
  • 1964
  • 1969
  • 1975
  • 1979
  • 1984
  • 1989
  • 1994
  • 1999
  • 2004
  • 2009
  • 2014
  • 2015
  • 2020
  • 2025
Referendums