2016 California Proposition 52

California law
Choice
Votes %
Yes 9,427,714 70.07%
No 4,026,710 29.93%
Valid votes 13,454,424 92.09%
Invalid or blank votes 1,156,085 7.91%
Total votes 14,610,509 100.00%
Registered voters/turnout 19,411,771 75.27%

Results by county

Yes

  50–60%
  60–70%
  70–80%

Source: California Secretary of State[1]
Elections in California
U.S. President
U.S. Senate
U.S. House of Representatives
  • v
  • t
  • e
Executive
Governor
Lieutenant governor
Attorney general
Secretary of state
Treasurer
Controller
Insurance commissioner
Superintendent
Board of equalization

Legislature
Senate
Assembly

Judiciary
Court of appeals

Elections by year
  • v
  • t
  • e
1910–1919
1960–1969
1970–1979
1980–1989
1990–1999
2000–2009
2010–2019
2020–2029
Full list
  • v
  • t
  • e
Other localities
Bakersfield

Mayoral elections:

Fresno

Mayoral elections:

Oakland

Mayoral elections:

Riverside

Mayoral elections:

San Bernardino

Mayoral elections:

Stockton

Mayoral elections:

  • v
  • t
  • e
  • v
  • t
  • e

Proposition 52 is a California ballot proposition that passed on the November 8, 2016 ballot, regarding indefinitely extending an existing charge on hospitals to fund Medi-Cal health care services. The charge, called the "Hospital Quality Assurance Fee", has been collected since 2009 with temporary renewals and was scheduled to expire on January 1, 2018.[2]

Arguments for the measure stated that the charge helps to secure more than $4 billion in federal matching funds annually. Additionally, the measure would help curtail the diversion of some of the funds to things other than Medi-Cal.[3] Arguments against the measure stated that it lacks oversight and that there would still be no guarantee that funds would be spent on healthcare.[4][5]

References

  1. ^ "Statement of Vote - November 8, 2016, General Election". December 16, 2016. Retrieved January 7, 2017.
  2. ^ "Official Voter Information Guide" (PDF). California Secretary of State. Retrieved 13 September 2016.
  3. ^ "Yes on Proposition 52 to keep Medi-Cal funded". Los Angeles Times. September 13, 2016. Retrieved 17 September 2016.
  4. ^ Colliver, Victoria (September 9, 2016). "Prop. 52, a measure to fund Medi-Cal, is its own worst enemy". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 17 September 2016.
  5. ^ "California Proposition 52, Voter Approval to Divert Hospital Fee Revenue Dedicated to Medi-Cal (2016)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved 13 September 2016.

External links

  • Yes on Proposition 52
  • No on 52


Stub icon

This article about the politics of California is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e