Apparentment

Party-list addition system in elections
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in German. (December 2010) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
  • View a machine-translated version of the German article.
  • Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia.
  • Consider adding a topic to this template: there are already 9,097 articles in the main category, and specifying|topic= will aid in categorization.
  • Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
  • You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Wikipedia article at [[:de:Listenverbindung]]; see its history for attribution.
  • You should also add the template {{Translated|de|Listenverbindung}} to the talk page.
  • For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation.
Part of the Politics series
Electoral systems
Ballot box
Single-winner/majoritarian
Plurality
  • First-past-the-post
  • Plurality at-large (plurality block voting)
  • General ticket (party block voting)

Multi-round voting


Ranked / preferential systems


Cardinal / graded systems

icon Politics portal
  • v
  • t
  • e

Apparentment is the name given to the system, sometimes provided for in elections conducted according to the party-list proportional representation system, which allows parties to specify electoral alliances.[1] The system has been used in Switzerland since 1919, and is also used in Israel[2] and Denmark (local and European Parliament elections only).

Under list proportional representation, seats are awarded for each quota of votes obtained. Any votes excess to the quota are lost. Under apparentment, parties combine their vote excess, which may yield an additional full quota and candidate elected. For example, if there are 100 seats in the legislature, the quota per seat will be around 1%. If two parties poll 1.4 and 1.3 quotas respectively, they will probably only win one seat each if their votes are counted separately (assuming there is no further threshold, such as Germany's 5% barrier) but if they can combine their votes, they will have 2.7 quotas in total and a good chance of winning 3 seats overall. Usually the third seat would go to the party with 1.4% as it has more votes within the alliance.

There are two possible types of apparentment: different parties within a single electoral district combining their results, or the same party competing in different electoral districts combining these results.

The system introduces an element of ordinality. It is akin to a prespecified ranking in a preferential voting system like alternative vote or single transferable vote, as is used with the above-the-line system in Australian elections.

See also

References

  1. ^ Lijphart, Arend (1994). Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945-1990. Comparative European Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-828054-8.
  2. ^ Bochsler, Daniel (December 2010). "Who gains from apparentments under D'Hondt?" (PDF). Electoral Studies. 29 (4): 617–627. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2010.06.001.


Stub icon

This election-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e