Barbier v. Connolly

1885 United States Supreme Court case
Barbier v. Connolly
Submitted November 25, 1884
Decided January 5, 1885
Full case nameBarbier v. Connolly
Citations113 U.S. 27 (more)
5 S. Ct. 357; 28 L. Ed. 923; 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1647
Holding
A municipal ordinance prohibiting from washing and ironing in public laundries and washhouses within defined territorial limits from ten o'clock at night to six in the morning is a purely police regulation within the competency of a municipality possessed of the ordinary powers. The Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution does not impair the police power of a state.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Morrison Waite
Associate Justices
Samuel F. Miller · Stephen J. Field
Joseph P. Bradley · John M. Harlan
William B. Woods · Stanley Matthews
Horace Gray · Samuel Blatchford
Case opinion
MajorityField, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U.S. 27 (1885), was a United States Supreme Court in which the Court considered the application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution to a San Francisco ordinance regulating the establishment of public laundries. The Court held that the regulation of laundries for public health and public safety reasons were clearly within the police powers of the state, and the Fourteenth Amendment was not meant to interfere with the police powers of the state.

External links

  • Text of Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U.S. 27 (1885) is available from: Google Scholar  Justia  Library of Congress 
  • v
  • t
  • e
ChemicalsWashingDryingFoldingFinishingConcepts
OrganizationsCultureAccessoriesLawPlaces
  • v
  • t
  • e
Economic substantive
due process
Right to privacy
Abortion jurisprudence
Civil rights liability
under Section 1983
Other
Race
Sex
Sexual orientation
Alienage
Residency
Other
Other


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e