Carlos de Villegas

19th-century Bolivian military leader
Carlos de Villegas
Minister of War
In office
28 October 1876 – 7 May 1878
PresidentHilarión Daza
Preceded byAgustín Aspiazu
Succeeded byBenjamin Lens
Personal details
Born(1824-03-01)March 1, 1824
San Antonio de Morayo, Bolivia
DiedJanuary 7, 1897(1897-01-07) (aged 72)
La Paz, Bolivia
Resting placeGeneral Cemetery of La Paz
SpouseBelizenda Constanza Ribera
Children6
Parent(s)José Fausto de Villegas
Agustina Aramayo
OccupationMilitary officer
Signature
Military service
Branch/serviceBolivian Army
RankDivision general
Battles/wars

Carlos de Villegas (1 March 1824 – 7 January 1897)[1] was a Bolivian military officer, statesman, and politician who served during the War of the Confederation, the Peruvian–Bolivian War of 1841–42, and the War of the Pacific. He was a noted war hero in Bolivia, serving in several posts throughout his lifetime, including as Minister of War. He was the father of Bolivian General Carlos Manuel de Villegas.

Starting his military career at a young age, Villegas spent a large part of his youth either fighting in international wars or in civil wars. He lived through the presidencies of Manuel Isidoro Belzu and José María Linares, times in which he took arms in favor of the current government in opposition to insurrections. However, he did favor the government of Linares, whom he supported and helped take power in 1857. Remaining loyal to Linares for most of his administration, once the dictator had lost most support and was betrayed by his Minister of War, José María de Achá, Villegas turned on his former benefactor.

Under Achá, Villegas flourished and ascended to the rank of general, occupying high positions in the military and government. However, he was exiled from Bolivia when Mariano Melgarejo took power in 1864. Joining the revolution against the aforementioned caudillo, Villegas joined the ranks of Agustín Morales and Tomás Frías in what seemed a sacrosanct cause to oust an unpopular tyrant. Despite his inclination to support Frías, he was unable to support the President when he was surrounded at the Palacio Quemado and forced to resign in 1876. Hilarión Daza, now President, appointed Villegas as Minister of War. During his tenure, he put down the violent uprising led by Andrés Ibañez, whom he knew personally.

Later, he had a significant role during the War of the Pacific, in which he was given command of a division. Seeing action against the Chileans at the Battle of San Francisco, he was wounded and captured. After the end of the war, he continued his political and military career, occupying several high posts in the last years of his life until his retirement in the early 1890s. His long career, both political and military, shed light onto a turbulent period of Bolivian history.

Early life and military career

Birth and youth

Villegas was born in San Antonio de Morayo, Chichas Province, on March 1, 1824. His parents were José Fausto Villegas and Agustina Aramayo de Villegas. He spent his early years in that province, where he received a very limited education, as schools were scarce in those times and mainly located in the capitals. While still in his youth, driven by his adventurous character, he enlisted in the army and quickly distinguished himself. On April 22, 1838, he was promoted to cadet as a reward for his good conduct.[2][1]

War of the Confederation and Ingavi

The attack on the Pan de Azucar during the Battle of Yungay. Villegas, although young, was present there.

As a cadet, he participated in the campaign of the Peru–Bolivian Confederation. Villegas stood out in the Battle of Buin on January 6, 1839, as well as in the Battle of Yungay, which took place in the same month and year. For his bravery and excellent behavior during this unsuccessful war for Bolivia, he received an honor medal for the 'Pacification of Peru'. Provisional President José Miguel de Velasco promoted the young cadet to the rank of ensign on May 20, 1839. Later, when Velasco was proclaimed constitutional president, Villegas was promoted again and received the rank of lieutenant on September 20, 1840. As a Lieutenant, he participated in the defensive campaign following Agustín Gamarra's invasion, led by General José Ballivián, contributing to the victory at Ingavi on November 18, 1841. After this victory, Villegas was promoted to the rank of captain by Provisional President Ballivián on November 21, 1841, just three days after the victory. At the same time, he was decorated with an honor medal and declared a "benefactor of the homeland in a heroic and eminent degree." Among those who marched to Peru after Ingavi was Villegas, staying in the neighboring nation until the treaties between Bolivia and Peru were concluded.[3][4]

Villegas participated in several battles that would be significant in Bolivia's military history. In Iruya and Montenegro, the Bolivians defeated the Argentinians, and in Yanacocha and Ingavi, they defeated the Peruvians. Impressing his superiors in each of these actions, Villegas was considered an exemplary military officer. He was promoted to major on November 18, 1845, with his commissions signed by President Ballivián. He rose to the rank of commander on May 31, 1848, with his commissions signed by President Velasco. On October 18, 1848, he participated in the Battle of Quirpinchaca, and a few days later, on December 6, in the Battle of Yamparáez. In both encounters, Villegas defended Velasco's regime against the uprisings of leaders attempting to seize power from the aforementioned. General Manuel Isidoro Belzu managed to seize the presidency in the fields of Yamparáez. Supported by the lower classes of the population, to whom he showered favors, Belzu opposed the aristocrats of the country. Villegas joined Belzu's enemies and, throughout the time the belcista party governed, he remained among the insurgents, fighting in support of José María Linares. The civil war that unfolded in Bolivia during this period is one of the most tenacious and bloody in Bolivian history.[5][6]

Internal chaos

Conflict between belcistas and linaristas

Triumph of Linares and Villegas' death sentence

Belzu and Linares were the protagonists of this civil war. Bolivia was essentially a field of conspiracy or struggle; the educated and aristocratic part sided with Linares, while the popular masses with the artisans sided with Belzu. The conflict did not remain solely within Bolivia's borders. The borders, where those involved sought refuge, were also a theater of operations during this turbulent period. Belzu distrusted everyone, pitting the lower classes against the upper classes, attacking and humiliating those who, due to their wealth and family pride, formed the aristocracy.[7] Linares had the support of university students and members of elite families, presenting himself determined to defeat caudillismo, investing all his fortune and that of his political allies in a cause considered sacred, and in whose triumph he and his supporters saw the regeneration of the homeland seemingly sunk in the mire. This idea gave rise to the name of the linarista Generator Party.[8][7]

In the midst of this war, Linares granted promotions and ranks that were not truly valid because they did not emanate from an established or organized authority. However, they had a certain hope of being validated once the cause, which constantly gained popular sympathy, triumphed. Villegas was rewarded with the ranks of lieutenant colonel and colonel. But when Linares' cause triumphed and the ranks received during the struggle were confirmed, he submitted the following unsuccessful resignation:[9]

I, the citizen Carlos de Villegas, before your respects, say: that the military career is one of selflessness and sacrifices, and as long as promotions are not the reward for significant feats in war or the recompense for long services rendered without blemish, I understand that it cannot be that brilliant institution of honor. The ranks conferred in upheavals do not always attest to the valor, capacity, and morality of the recipient. Perhaps the crisis is exploited to substitute exaggerated claims for true merit. In those moments of upheaval, military ranks have been distributed profusely, either due to the demands of the moment or because it was considered necessary to invest certain individuals with a higher character for the performance of important services. But it is not patriotic, Sir, to retain those ranks, often obtained out of necessity and without the deliberate deliberation of the granting authority. It is time now for there to be no prodigality and for each one to be considered in his just military position. After the Battle of Yamparáez, in which I participated in the national army, I have continued in the heroic and great struggle that the people have sustained for nine years against usurpation and tyranny, to establish the cause of principles. During this time, I have been conferred the ranks of Lieutenant Colonel and Colonel, which I accepted without hesitation, and I had accepted even higher ones in critical moments when I believed that nothing should be omitted to liberate the Fatherland. At present, those circumstances have ceased; Bolivia inaugurates a government that I am sure will lead to its glorious future, and it is time to rectify the sacrifices made to achieve it. This, Sir, prompts me to submit to you the resignation of the ranks mentioned, which I obtained during revolutionary times, and desiring to remain in the position of Commander, which I obtained in normal times and in accordance with the hierarchy of the national army before December 6, 1848. In the midst of tranquility and peace, whether leader or soldier, one serves the Homeland equally. In this virtue, I request that you kindly order what I am asking, considering my services only as duties fulfilled in service to the Homeland, which will be justice, and for this, etc.—Carlos de Villegas.

Despite his resignation, Linares and the Minister of War, Gregorio Perez, still conferred the ranks onto Villegas. Prior to Linares' triumph, Bolivia was governed by General Jorge Córdova, who was reputed to have a kind character for saving "so many victims from the gallows." However, as the successor of Belzu, his father-in-law, and following Belzu's policies and instructions, insurrection continued to simmer in Bolivia, and conspirators appeared increasingly resolved. Bolivia persisted just as Belzu had depicted it in an official document when he said: "Successive revolutions, revolutions in the South, revolutions in the North, revolutions fostered by my enemies, led by my friends, combined in my own abode... Holy God!... condemned me to a perpetual state of combat".[7] Indeed, the political crisis was a bloody struggle between the government and the increasingly powerful public opinion in favor of Linares. Córdova was in La Paz after declaring amnesty on January 31, 1856, when it became known that a group of conspirators was actively working to disrupt order: "Based on a report made by two sergeants, Colonel Celada caught Colonel Villegas in the act of conspiracy against the government on March 4, along with other leaders, officers, and sergeants, proclaiming, as in previous uprisings, the presidency of Linares.[7] Arrested and brought to trial, they were sentenced to capital punishment. However, guided by the characteristic clemency of General Córdova, the government commuted this sentence to imprisonment for eight of the conspirators. The remaining three, Colonel Villegas, Major Eduardo Dávalos, and Sergeant Manuel Angulo, were to be executed on March 8".[10]

General Belzu's conflict with Linares allowed for Villegas to rise quickly within the ranks of the army. By 1858, he was already a colonel.

The people of La Paz were deeply perturbed and utilized every means at their disposal to save them. As the condemned approached the gallows, the tone of pleas changed to threats, reaching the point where the crowd armed themselves to prevent the execution. Two young Cochabamba citizens, Don Cupertino Méndez and Don Pedro Nernuldes, particularly stood out in this cause. The danger of a clash between the people and the armed forces was imminent. Córdova himself observed this scene from the palace balconies, where "the popular roar drowned out all other noise".[11]

As was noted by Luis M. Guzmán in Historia de Bolivia, the events that transpired that day were almost commonplace in Bolivia. Although approving of the clemency shown, he still condemns the belcista party:[12][13]

In the end, compassion triumphed over the severity of military laws. The condemned showed bravery and composure as they marched to the gallows. General Córdova, moved by these events, not only granted them pardon but had them brought to the palace; he embraced them and set them free. Such generosity should have been acknowledged and appreciated, but administrative aptitude does not originate from the sources of political sentimentality. Córdova was the continuation of a bastard government condemned by national opinion, and that illegitimacy was not purged by the noble impulses of an individual.

Another witness to those events said the following about Villegas' behavior throughout the ordeal:[14]

I was assured that one of the most uncompromising linaristas supporters had been captured, and this was Colonel, still young, Carlos de Villegas. I had very good news about this military officer and wanted to verify the great personal courage that had been so praised to me. I put myself in observation, leveraging my position and connections. It is not uncommon among the Bolivian military for these bursts of courage that decide a battle... however, it has astonished me to see a young man, full of hopes, in the midst of a brilliant career, sentenced to death, calm and resolved, showing no desire to live, awaiting death as one awaits relief after a hot day in our Yungas, for the night to temper the heat of a summer sun. This is how I saw Villegas, through reports during his time in prison and during the journey to the gallows, proud, without affectation, calm without pretense; he had a very well-tempered soul, and perhaps that is why his philosophical ideas were daring and unshakable, as he demonstrated later.

Fall of Linares

The political landscape changed in Bolivia with the fall of Córdova and the rise of Linares. The disorganization of the branches of government and even social institutions was complete. Linares embarked on a path of reforms with the intention of modernizing the country but lacked the patience and prudence required for such consequential reforms. Unrest and conspiracies resumed, forcing Linares to declare himself a dictator to facilitate the enactment of his decrees. Because he punished those who resisted his government with extreme severity, he began to lose popularity until he was overthrown in a coup on January 14, 1861.[7] During Linares' administration, Villegas, who had fought against Belzu and Córdova, continued in his military position. Having resigned the ranks he obtained during the Linares uprising, he was "called back to active service on September 8, 1857, with the rank of effective Colonel." This dispatch, signed by President Linares and Minister of War José María de Acha, was issued in Oruro on February 1, 1859. Villegas remained loyal until Achá betrayed Linares and overthrew him.[15]

Governments of Achá, Melgarejo, Morales, and Ballivián

Villegas lived exiled throughout most of Melgarejo's presidency.

Under the Achá administration, Villegas served in the same capacity of colonel in the "Bolívar Squadron," having previously held the position of Commander General of Oruro. Due to his merits and recognized competence, Achá entrusted Villegas with the provisional position of Minister of War, by decree, on September 19, 1862. He participated in the battles of San Juan on September 15, 1862, and the assault on the barricades of La Paz on October 16 of the same year, receiving a wound in the latter engagement that incapacitated him from the early moments. The Extraordinary Legislative Assembly held in Oruro in 1863 promoted Colonel Villegas to the rank of Brigadier general by law on June 25, 1863. Subsequently, he was elected Deputy for the Chayanta District to the 1863 National Assembly, to which he attended in that capacity. He successively held positions as Inspector General of the Army, Commander General of the Department of Cochabamba, Prefect and Commander General of the Department of Oruro, President of the Military Court, and Chief of Staff of the Army.[16][17]

When Villegas was serving as the Commander General of the Department of Cochabamba, the military insurrection of December 28, 1864, erupted, resulting in the presidency of Mariano Melgarejo.[18] Villegas, along with several others, had to cross Bolivia's borders, being proscribed from the country. The government of Melgarejo, known as the "sexenio," marked a period of dictatorship and caudillism that suppressed various aspects of society. It was a time of revolutions, executions, and assassinations, including that of Belzu. It is said that during this period:[19]

The laws, institutions, and guarantees were trampled upon by this tyrant, republican dignity, honorability, family respect, and public morality suffered a profound disturbance whose consequences were felt for many years, preparing the vices that still afflict Bolivian society and are painfully discovered when studied from the perspective of public interest. On the international stage, Melgarejo's administration broke national integrity and founded the disastrous sectional school, with such sad memories. Those who did not accept the government of this leader declared themselves in perpetual insurrection, always dominated and always resurging, or went into exile.

While in Peru, Villegas received the appointment of Consul in the Peruvian port of Callao, where he distinguished himself in his duties. By the end of 1870, Melgarejo's regime was collapsing. General José María Calderón was besieged La Paz, and Melgarejo fled from Bolivia to Chile. On January 15, 1871, Calderón was finally defeated, and Melgarejo was overthrown.[20] Villegas established his residence in Cochabamba, where he was elected Mayor, and later, by the government of Adolfo Ballivián, Commander General of that Department on May 1, 1873, a position he had already held before. He was holding this position when an uprising occurred; the Third Battalion revolted against its commanders on November 30, 1874. Villegas managed to control the growing force of the rebels. He pursued the mutinous forces and finally succeeded in defeating them on January 7, 1875, in Sipesipe.[21]

Frías administration

Due to his victory, Villegas was warmly applauded by the government of Tomás Frías, "deserving to be considered one of the most capable men for public office." Villegas was given positions in the President's Secretariat as well as in the Ministry of War. Both of these positions were granted by Eliodoro Camacho, who signed documents on behalf of Villegas with his name:[22][23]

The President of the Republic is very pleased with the report you provide on the defeat of the rebels in Sipesipe on the 7th of this month, both because this event reveals the strength the Government has in the public opinion of the Nation, and because it expresses the inadequacy and insignificance of the revolution that comes to disturb the normal course that the country was beginning to take. This Ministry rightly judges that, through your activity and the enthusiasm of those accompanying you, you will have succeeded in completely dispersing the seditious force in that Department and recovering the weapons it carried. Moreover, outside the barracks in La Paz and the few bandits in Colquechaca, the rest of the Republic remains calm, making eloquent demonstrations against the revolution at every moment. As for the former, the Government, which arrived this afternoon at this point, will soon be upon them, and regarding the latter, the measures have already been taken that should soon reduce them to subordination to the Government and the law. Tomorrow, the Government will move directly to Viacha, where the Constitutional Army awaits, and where it will be on the 15th without fail to begin military operations against the traitors of La Paz. Heartily congratulating you on the favorable success you have achieved against the rebels afflicting that Department for forty days, I am pleased to repeat myself as your attentive and reliable servant.—Eliodoro Camacho—Ministry of War La Paz.— February 1, 1875.

Villegas' victory at Sipesipe was important for the Government. However, despite such a crushing victory inflicted upon the rebels, the revolution continued to spread across the country:[24]

By your communication addressed to the Prefecture of Oruro, this Ministry comes to know that you vacated the Capital of that Department with the forces under your command, in the early morning of the last 29th due to the gathering of those from Cliza and Colquechaca. This measure, which, judging absolutely, would seem discordant due to the abandonment in which it has left, at the mercy of the enemy, a military stronghold as important as Cochabamba, the President understands that some very significant reason must have determined it, so he refrains from any qualification that could approve or censure such a measure until he has detailed knowledge of the reasons. In the meantime, he directs:

1st—That the incorporation of the Bolívar Squadron with the Constitutional Battalion, you take supreme command of the forces to operate immediately against the enemy, in the way most convenient to defeat them and in a manner that best ensures the success of victory.

2nd—If the enemy fortifies himself in Cochabamba, you will avoid any attack against barricades, limiting yourself to tightening the siege as much as possible and using maneuvers and stratagems that could draw the enemy out of his entrenchments.

3rd—You will keep your rear clear to give frequent notices to this Ministry about the state of your operations and to receive the orders that, in turn, it may have to communicate to you.

These instructions, of a general nature, do not limit you in any way to take measures that good judgment advises in exceptional circumstances that could not be foreseen and that are left to your good sense and military expertise.—God save you.—Eliodoro Camacho.—Frías.

Despite the victories achieved by the Frías administration and Villegas in different parts, riots and uprisings were growing in number, and much of the Department of Cochabamba was in turmoil, with notable and prestigious figures leading the insurgents, such as Belisario Antezana, Quintín Quevedo, and Miguel María Aguirre, who could effectively combat the forces of the then-constituted Government.[25] Nevertheless, Villegas maintained his loyalty to the democratic presidency of Frías. On February 5, 1875, he was appointed Prefect and Commander General of the Department of Oruro, a position he resigned from on March 18 of the same year due to health reasons. He was appointed President of the Martial Court on January 4, 1876, and Chief of Staff shortly after.[26]

The Minister of War, Hilarión Daza, who was also the Chief of the First Battalion (Colorados), had through conspiracies risen to high positions and been designated the official candidate for the Presidency of the Republic. He kidnapped President Frías on May 4, 1876, and took control of the country. It is said that "Daza, following the tradition of those who seized power, proclaimed himself, by Decree dated the day of the coup, Provisional President. Disorder in the administration and the squandering of public funds began from then on. He appointed Jorge Oblitas as Secretary General and later formed his cabinet composed of the following ministers: José M. del Carpio for Foreign Relations and Government, Ignacio Salvatierra for Finance and Industry, Agustín Aspiazu for Justice, Worship, and Public Instruction, Carlos de Villegas for War;[27] these individuals mitigated the disorder in the administration".[28]

Daza administration

Santa Cruz Revolution

Villegas was promoted to division general by dictatorial decree on August 21, 1876, approved by the National Assembly in 1877, and appointed Minister of War by decree on October 1 of the same year, along with the ministers mentioned earlier. Resistance against the coup began in some centers of Bolivia, mainly in Cochabamba, but as they were isolated, they were unsuccessful. The most serious insurrection occurred in Santa Cruz. Andrés Ibañez proclaimed the federation on October 1, 1876. To the east of Bolivia lies the Department of Santa Cruz. Especially during this time, the Department of Santa Cruz was separated from the rest of Bolivia by sparsely populated areas and poor roads.[29] Increasingly distant from the central power, the elite in Santa Cruz favored a federal model for Bolivia.[30][31]

In the account of the events, Andrés Ibañez recounts from the perspective of the rebellion how the bloodiest revolution of General Daza's presidency was triggered:[32]

"SANTA CRUZ REVOLUTION—ITS ORIGIN AND DIRECTION GIVEN BY DR. ANDRÉS IBAÑEZ.

It was 8 o'clock in the evening on October 1, 1876, when the garrison column of the city of Santa Cruz, firing shots into the air, mutinied – shouts of 'Long live unity, long live Dr. Ibañez, we want money, long live General Daza,' deafened the city. Bursting into the prison which kept Ibañez prisoner, a mob stormed the cell where the acclaimed Dr. Andrés Ibañez had been since August 29. The soldiers complained to him about nudity, harsh treatment, and lack of rations, eventually naming him Prefect and Commander-in-Chief of the Department, under the assumed government of General Daza. The prisoner, still in shackles, restrained the insurgents, who, forming groups, were about to overflow through the city. He distributed the money intended for their orderly departure, as ordered by the Daza authorities to the General Headquarters.

Informed of everything that was happening, Colonel Ignacio Romero, the highest military authority there, headed to the center of the city accompanied only by two orderlies. With immeasurable courage, he attacked the mutineers, firing several shots, fatally wounding the officer Francisco Guardia, overpowering the sentinel, and entering the guardhouse. A moment of imminent danger for Dr. Ibañez, who, if the resistance of the troops had been overcome, would have been killed in the cell where he was held. [A woman] begged him to withdraw and abandon his attempt to retry it, but Romero, like a Spartan soldier, held his ground. He fired more revolver shots, injuring two soldiers, after which he received a volley and died with unparalleled courage, unfortunately in the service of a bad cause because the blood shed in defense of a tyrant is sterile.

This is how Ibañez describes the initial events of the Santa Cruz revolution, illustrating the bloody nature of the uprisings that plagued Bolivia during the era of caudillismo. Ibañez continues his account of this event: "At the sound of gunfire, the people assumed that Dr. Ibañez had been executed, rushed to the main square, and found him getting unshackled. Then the crowd cheered and acclaimed him, thus ending that memorable night when the Column signed an explanatory document about their actions.[33] The next day, Dr. Ibañez summoned the people, through a public notice, to a meeting, and the document by which he was invested with political and military authority and granted the necessary powers for the situation is signed by more than 700 signatures!"[34][35] Demetrio Roca, in his pamphlet "My Conduct and My Defense," says: "The next day, the new leader validated his actions with a small part of a compliant people, called a popular assembly".[36] The pamphlet by Roca sheds light on the fact that only a minority of the people of Santa Cruz favored the federation. Wealthy elites, whose interests did not reflect the desires of the lower classes, were in favor. Villegas, who was serving as the Minister of War, was sent to Santa Cruz with the rank of "Supreme Political and Military Chief of the Departments of Santa Cruz and Beni, holding the broadest powers in his authority for the political, military, and administrative arrangement of those Departments.[37] In addition to the instructions received to impose the full rigor of the law on the insurgents," in a letter dated January 22, 1877, he was recommended faithful and exact compliance with the Supreme Decree of January 19 of the same year. This Supreme Decree outlined the following:[38][39]

HILARION DAZA, PROVISIONAL PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC, &.—Considering, &.—DECREE:

Article 1.°—The Provisional Statute of May 4, 1861, which was put into effect by Decree of December 9 of the past year, is suspended in the Department of Santa Cruz until order is restored in that District.

Art. 2.°—All individuals who directly or indirectly participated in the revolutionary movements in the mentioned Department since October 1 of last year will be judged by verbal military tribunals and sentenced according to article 115 of the Penal Code.

Art. 3.°—The properties of the insurgents are, according to articles 18 and following of the cited Code, subject to civil liability, and both the Administrators of the Fiscal and Municipal Treasury and private citizens who have been harmed by the revolutionaries must initiate legal action to make it effective.

The Minister of Government is in charge of the execution of this Decree and of publishing and circulating it to those concerned.

Given in La Paz, on January 19, 1877.

Signed: HILARION DAZA.—Signed: Manuel Ignacio Salvatierra.—Signed: José Manuel del Carpio.—Signed: Carlos de Villegas.—Countersigned: Jorge Oblitas.—It is in accordance.—The Chief Clerk: Luciano Valle.

Clash with Daza

When General Villegas arrived in Santa Cruz, he tried to mitigate the severity of the supreme orders and issued some decrees recorded in the Official Departmental Bulletin, from which the following is extracted:[40]

CARLOS DE VILLEGAS,—GENERAL-IN-CHIEF OF THE EASTERN DIVISION, AND SUPREME POLITICAL AND MILITARY CHIEF OF THE DEPARTMENTS OF COCHABAMBA, SANTA CRUZ, AND BENI.—Considering:

That the primary objective of the mission entrusted to me by the Supreme Government is the pacification of this Department, through the restoration of order and the social and individual guarantees of citizens, the only means to ensure the benefits of public peace,

DECREE:

Article 1.°—Every individual who, having taken up arms under the Ibañez faction, voluntarily abandons its ranks and presents themselves to the Departmental Political Authority, shall be under the protection and guarantees of the law.

Art. 2.°—The individual or individuals mentioned in the previous article who present themselves with weapons will be rewarded in proportion to the nature and quality of the arms surrendered.

Art. 3.°—This Decree shall be in force for a period of 15 days from the date.

Art. 4.°—The Prefect of the Department shall take care of its publication, printing, and circulation to those concerned.

Given in Santa Cruz, on the nineteenth day of March in the year one thousand eight hundred and seventy-seven.—C. De Villegas.—The Secretary—Demetrio Roca.

These decrees, issued to reduce the punishment of the federalists, were strongly criticized by President Daza and gave rise to several letters containing more or less severe reprimands to the Supreme Chief, one of these letters is the one sent on April 26, with an air of urgency and peremptory orders to the transit authorities, and the letter is as follows:[41]

MINISTRY OF GOVERNMENT.—La Paz, April 20, 1877.—To the Supreme Political and Military Chief of the Eastern Departments.—Sir: Without official communication to which to respond to you by this mail, I have been entrusted by the Provisional President of the Republic to express to you: that, having sent to this Ministry by the Prefect of the Department, the No. 6 of "The Official Departmental Bulletin" published in that Capital, you have recorded in it the different administrative arrangements issued by that Chief in the form of supreme decrees, an attribution reserved exclusively for the constituted Executive Power.

Among the various official acts contained in the aforementioned issue of the "Bulletin," the Supreme Chief of the State has had to express his surprise at the Decree of March 19, by which you grant protection and guarantees to individuals who, having taken up arms in the Ibañez faction, voluntarily abandon its ranks and present themselves to the Departmental authority, promising them a proportional gratification for the arms they surrender. His surprise is all the greater, Mr. Supreme Chief, because the aforementioned Decree is in open contradiction to the Supreme Decree sanctioned on January 19 of the current year, by which the Government declared the city of Santa Cruz under siege, where individual guarantees were suspended by this single fact, whose immediate and legal consequence founded the reason for the precepts set forth in articles 2.° and 3.°, whereby the insurgents must be judged in verbal military tribunals, and their properties are subject to civil liability for their crimes.

There has been no precedent, Mr. Supreme Chief, of supreme decrees being repealed by subordinate authorities, for the simple reason that in the administrative hierarchy there must be order for the successful outcome of public affairs. Granting guarantees to those who have caused so much harm to national interests is not acceptable in the face of a competent force with which you were entrusted, not only to unveil the conspiracy but also to enforce the penal sanction to which the Government subjected them by supreme determination to which you contributed with your own signature, in your capacity as a Minister of State.

For the reasons stated and to safeguard morality and the need to punish the criminals, please be ordered by the President of the Republic to give the most exact compliance with the Supreme Decree of January 19 of the current year.—I take this opportunity to reiterate to you my expressions of esteem.—God save you.—Daza.—J. Oblitas.

Triumph in Santa Cruz

The federal forces had withdrawn from the city as the 300 men sent by the government approached, and they hadn't even managed to obstruct the march of this force, taking advantage of the great natural difficulties. Ibañez's supporters also amounted to 300 soldiers.[42] Ibañez and his companions withdrew towards the Brazilian border. In order to put an end to them, who formed the core of the federal insurrection, Villegas marched through the forests in pursuit, managing to find them in San Diego.[43] After a challenging march through swamps and forests, at two in the morning, Ibañez and his companions were sleeping in some shacks in San Diego when they woke up surrounded by the forces pursuing them.[44] Without resistance, they surrendered, offering to go into exile in exchange for their lives, a proposal that was not accepted due to the strict orders of the government.[45] Although Villegas was ordered to exterminate the Santa Cruz revolution, his ideology was more similar to Ibañez's than to Daza's. In fact, according to an anonymous source, the two men had a quite dramatic meeting:[46]

Villegas and Ibañez had a long conference, after which, it was seen that the Supreme Chief, who had been a political colleague of the federal leader, withdrew with tears in his eyes, silent and sad: the two friends had embraced and cried together, both were victims: Villegas of obedience and military discipline, and Andrés Ibañez of the rigor of a law dictated by the disastrous government of Daza.

The verbal Council of War sentenced them to death, and the sentence was executed. Those executed were: Andrés Ibañez, Benjamín Urgel, Cecilio Chávez, Robles, Tueros, Prado, Valverde, Montenegro, and Pavio the Paraguayan. The official document in which Villegas participated in the capture of the federalists is as follows:[47]

Sir: I have the honor to address this Ministry from this point, about fifteen leagues more or less from the dividing line with the Empire of Brazil, via Mato Grosso, to inform you that in the early morning of today, the gang led by Andrés Ibañez was surprised, and he fell into our hands, as well as his accomplices Francisco Javier Tueros, José María Prado, Manuel Valverde, and seven others of lesser importance. This fortunate circumstance that restores and ensures the empire of order throughout the territory of the Republic is mainly due to the zealous effort and hurried march that we have made from the port of Canoas, on the San Miguel River. Continuously pushing through, we have arrived at the towns of San Miguel and Santa Ana, as well as to this place, in a surprising and unexpected manner; so that, through this fact and the dispersion of the said gang, whose weaponry has fallen into our hands, I have completed the mission entrusted to me in the most thorough and satisfactory manner; and it is also probable that many of the bandits will fall into our hands, as I have opportunistically dispatched competent forces to go through the towns of the South and North of this Province and join me in the town of San Miguel or Santa Ana. I also inform you that the accomplices and spies of the aforementioned Ibañez, Benjamín Urgel and Cecilio Chávez, were caught red-handed, the former in the town of Santa Ana at three in the morning yesterday, and the latter at ten at night on the same day, at the location called Guarayos, nine leagues from this point, in a straight line towards the latter point, both of whom were executed immediately, following the respective verbal Council of War. Likewise, the same diligence will be carried out with the abovementioned individuals as soon as the Chacoma Squadron is assembled, still dispersed between the countryside and the forest, pursuing the scattered ones from today. It is highly satisfactory for me to congratulate the Supreme Government, through your worthy organ, while also reiterating my considerations of esteem to you.—May God keep you.—Carlos de Villegas.

The inhabitants of Santa Cruz received Villegas in triumph: the forced loans, amounting to 48,110 pesos (according to El Eventual of Santa Cruz), and the persecutions that had lasted from October 1, 1876, until the arrival of the government army, came to an end. Villegas and the "Pacifying Division of the East" received congratulations from the society of Santa Cruz and the Executive. Upon leaving Santa Cruz, Villegas, after completing the arduous mission entrusted by Daza, addressed the inhabitants of that department in a proclamation summarizing his wishes and justifying his behavior.[48][49]

War of the Pacific

Outbreak of war

General Buendía, commander of the joint allied army during the Battle of San Francisco.

More significant events were unfolding in the chancelleries of Bolivia, Chile, and Peru. When Villegas returned, crossing the long and difficult road that separated Santa Cruz from La Paz in those times, Bolivia was on the eve of war against Chile. Bolivia was facing a difficult situation due to the scarcity of provisions resulting from the poor harvests of 1878 and the squandering of fiscal revenues. Despite the diligence of the ministers, the administration had been affected by the corruption of Daza and his entourage. The demoralized army absorbed a large part of the budget and, nevertheless, was poorly armed and even worse disciplined. On February 28, 1878, General Villegas was appointed Inspector General of the Army.[50] The news of the occupation of Antofagasta by Chilean forces on February 14, 1879, reached La Paz on the 20th of the same month; by the 23rd, many people already knew about it, although Daza did not act, for unknown reasons, until the 26th when he declared that the country was in danger. Villegas, as the Commander General of the First Division, marched to Tacna.[51] The Bolivian Army, before defending its coastline, hastily marched to defend Peruvian territory, believing that the Chileans had more important plans in Peru. From Tacna, Villegas marched to the coastal area of the Department of Iquique. It is said that while marching, he addressed his soldiers, cursing the corrupt actions of Daza and Mariano Ignacio Prado: "Misappropriation of funds, social disorganization, and political intrigues, disturbed from time to time by more or less noisy protests, reign in our countries. The people do not realize that an abyss is opening at their feet, and journalists and writers use their wit to exalt the favored ones of fortune who have come to occupy public positions".[52][53]

An unforgiving terrain

Naval operations had ended in defeat for the allies; on October 8, 1879, the ironclad Huáscar was taken after the death of Commander Miguel Grau. Chile dominated the sea and could choose the landing place for the invading troops. The Chilean squadron sailed from Antofagasta to Pisagua to invade the Tarapacá desert. The defenders of the port of Pisagua, mostly Bolivians, resisted the landing, clashing with the Chilean fleet composed of 19 ships and an army of over ten thousand men on November 2, 1879. The garrison of the port consisted of 800 men, of which 150 were Peruvians. With the loss of Pisagua, the allied army, which had regrouped in Iquique, was in a desperate situation, blocked by the Chilean fleet at sea and trapped in the middle of a desert lacking resources, cut off by the enemy who had taken the town of San Francisco. To improve the situation, a plan was agreed upon to operate the armies of Iquique and Tacna simultaneously against the Chilean army. Daza left Arica on November 10, announcing to General Juan Buendía that he would be in command of the Chilean army on the 16th of that month. The Bolivian army, led by Daza, had to cross the Tarapacá desert.[54] Describing this desert, Vicuña Mackenna says:[55]

The high plateau of Tarapacá, between Iquique and Arica (41 Peruvian leagues), is not uniform like between Iquique and Loa. On the contrary, it is cut in various places by three enormous cracks that bear the name of ravines but are at the same time oases and abysses. The closest to Arica is the Vítor ravine, which is the smallest and flows into the sea nine leagues from that port. There is a small grassy hacienda called Chaca there, and a copper mine owned by Chileans on the banks of the Agua. Following to the south are the two ravines of Chiza and Camarones. Those are two ravines with slopes that look like walls, and the traveler, riding a sturdy and skilled mule, usually takes up to two hours to descend or climb, such is their steep roughness. The renowned amolonas of Illapel, on the road from Coquimbo, are mere scratches on the earth compared to those ravines that still bear all the signs of chaos on their flanks and in their depths. The Camarones ravine is 19 leagues from Arica, and Chiza is 30 leagues away. But both, when reaching the sea, expand into an estuary and form the alfalfa hacienda called Cuya, which, in small pastures owned by various owners, can measure about twenty hectares of irrigated pasture. The richest landowner in the area is, as always, the inevitable Frenchman from Chateaubriand. The towns of Camarones and Chiza are located towards the headwaters of the ravines and are simple settlements of Indians with some groups of straw huts, but are capitals of districts of their name. In the entire journey of the ravine that a stream of pretty color and bad taste moistens, there are patches of alfalfa, and the last one, stopped at Cuya by the sand dunes, as happens in the valleys of Chile when entering the Pacific Ocean, forms a swampy meadow inhabited by swarms of tasty and red shrimp. Hence the generic name of the place.

This harsh terrain acted as one of the greatest obstacles during the War of the Pacific. After arduous marches through this desert of sand and caliche, the Bolivian army arrived at Camarones. However, Daza, "instead of continuing his march towards the enemy, following the itinerary drawn up in advance in combination with the army of Iquique, deviated and cut communications with the Peruvians." While the Bolivian army advanced from the north of Arica until it stopped at Camarones, the allied army under General Buendía had completed its slow and disorderly concentration in Pozo-Almonte.[56] On November 14, the last remaining battalions were ready to march; the plan to unite these two fractions of the allied army was about to be realized.[53] Aside from Buendía, the army was also commanded Bolivian generals Bustamante, Villegas, Villamil, and Flores. The army, however, was unseuccessful; in all movements, the purpose of uniting with the division commanded by Daza was evident, and couriers were dispatched every hour without Daza responding.[53] The soldiers walked most of the night of November 17, and several army units got lost in the shadows. Carlos Molina, a witness, asserts that complete disorder reigned in all desert marches, with guides getting lost: "Over here!", "This way!", the lost ones exclaimed pictorially. They were the lost guides, who, from moment to moment, found and then abandoned the route under the influence of that inexplicable dizziness produced by the thick shadows of the night".[57]

Battle of San Francisco

Scene from the Battle of San Francisco, where Villegas was wounded and captured.

Around dawn on November 18, the tired battalions laid down to sleep on the frozen sand or under the makeshift covers of boards and mats from the nitrate works scattered in the Negreiros canton. The exhausted General Buendía took advantage of the scarce gift of sleep while the indefatigable Suárez went around all the posts and kept watch. The Peruvian army spent November 18 in those places with the meager sustenance of their backpacks until three in the afternoon when the delayed convoy of supplies and ammunition arrived in a hundred carts. "At night," eloquently states Molina, "when the wind blows through these solitudes, mysterious moans can be heard coming from the pits. Sometimes underground noises are heard that shake the surface of the petrified coast." That was how disorganized and desperate the situation of the allied army was in the first phase of the war.[58][59][60]

By decree of the Supreme Director of the War, dated in Arica, June 6, 1879, General Villegas was incorporated into the army under the command of General Buendía. The Bolivian division commanded by Villegas occupied the coastline between Pisagua and Iquique, and despite the insubordination prevailing in the army, Villegas managed to discipline his soldiers. On the march to the San Francisco hill, the lack of water began to affect the Bolivian army. Villegas constantly complained about this issue, and even though he received promises from Buendía, they were not fulfilled. When the allies reached the Chilean frontline, after a short rest, it was considered best to take a defensive stance, but Buendía's hesitations caused the loss of morning hours and other moments three times until it was decided to postpone the action to the next day: "The Bolivian army was formed: in the center, the 1st and 3rd Divisions, on the far left, the Villamil Division, in the rear forming a second battle line, the Villegas Division, and the reserve was under the command of Andrés Avelino Cáceres".[61][62]

At nine in the morning, the allied army was ready to attack. The well-positioned Chilean army on the heights of San Francisco faced the allies who, with the order to wait, had formed pavilions with their weapons and blankets to protect themselves from the scorching sun, while the Chilean army received new reinforcements, growing in number and advantages by the moment.[63] The allies were also waiting for the reinforcement commanded by Daza, which, according to the calculations of officers and soldiers, would arrive anytime. Profound silence reigned from that moment, and sixteen thousand men waited for the bugle call to begin the battle. Messengers brought, at that hour, the news of Daza's escape from Camarones. Suddenly, shots were fired in the slope of the hill without explicit order, without an attack plan, and the Chilean batteries began to crush the lines of the allies, whose weapons were useless at such a distance. Disorder enveloped the army, Peruvian cavalry initiated the escape: defeat presented itself from the first moments.[64] Vicuña Mackenna says of the battle: "It is true that the inexperienced Ayacucho (Lima troops) dispersed in a guerrilla near the salt flats and among the pens and mills scattered there to support the attacking columns of Colonel Lavadenz, who led the brave Espinar towards the San Francisco ridge, defended but not dominated by the cannons of the fearless Salvo".[65]

Defeat and incarceration

Villegas took the lead of his battalion, Illimani, and in a closed column, swept by shrapnel and shot in the back (due to the indescribable confusion in which the rear bodies entered), marched to San Francisco, whose office they occupied, organizing a second attack. In the first ten minutes of the battle, the Bolivians suffered casualties, and several soldiers deserted. Villegas organized a second attack, sent one of his aides to request assistance from Colonel Cáceres, who was in the rear guard, and gave the response that it was not up to him. Villegas began the second attack: "As soon as the vigilant Montoya perceived the parade, he fired his cannons and unleashed a hail of shrapnel on the ascending column, while the Atacama, quickly reorganized, returned to the charge, this time supported by the Coquimbo, which, like the rest of the center and left line, had not ceased firing.[66] The 3rd in line, placed on the plain, contributed greatly to dispersing General Villegas's column, assaulting the Bolivians from behind as they ascended because there was a moment when, mistaking the uniforms, those on the summit stopped shooting because they confused the enemy with a Chilean regiment." The Coquimbo fired 112 shots per square during the day. Wounded in the foot, with his hat and vicuña wool blanket shot to pieces, Villegas was forced to withdraw halfway through the battle. Villegas fought until he was incapacitated by the wound. Transferred to Chile as a prisoner of war, Villegas stayed there until April 1880 when there was an exchange of prisoners between Chile and Bolivia.[67][68]

Later life and death

On September 20, 1888, he was appointed Commander General in the Department of Cochabamba; on November 26 of the same year, Prefect and Commander General of the Department of La Paz, a position he held from November 27 for a year. He successively received appointments as Government Delegate in the Department of Oruro in May 1889; Inspector General of the National Army in November of the same year; Prefect of La Paz, a position he did not accept; Prefect and Commander General of the Department of Oruro in February 1890. Due to the insurrection led by Colonel José Manuel Pando, he was entrusted with the command of the Government forces. After complying with the orders and the delegation conferred by the Government, he requested his retirement, which was decreed in February 1892. In 1892, he was appointed Jury of the Press in La Paz; in 1893, he was designated to travel to Puno to transfer the remains of General Ballivián. He could not carry out this task, but he was appointed as one of the speakers during the funerals held at the La Paz Cathedral on April 10 of that year.[69]

Villegas died on January 7, 1897, in La Paz. The cause of death is said to have been pneumonia and colerina.[70] After his death, the Bolivian press showered his memory with praise and declared him “the last meritorious general of a lost generation”.[71][72]

Bibliography

  • Arana, Diego Barros (1979). Historia de la guerra del Pacifico, 1879-1881 (in Spanish). Editorial Andres Bello.
  • Canales, José Carlos (1947). Mariano Melgarejo: dictator-president of Bolivia, 1864-1871 (in Spanish). University of California.
  • Dixon, Jeffrey S.; Sarkees, Meredith Reid (2015-09-18). A Guide to Intra-state Wars: An Examination of Civil, Regional, and Intercommunal Wars, 1816-2014. CQ Press. ISBN 978-1-5063-1798-4.
  • Díaz, Julio (1929). Los generales de Bolivia, 1825-1925 (in Spanish). Intendencia general de guerra.
  • Guzmán, Luis M. (1872). Historia de la República de Bolivia desde 1824 (in Spanish). Impr. del Siglo.
  • Heath, Dwight B. (1972). Historical Dictionary of Bolivia. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-0451-7.
  • Kramer, Pedro (2006). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipo-Litográfico.
  • Lora, Guillermo (1964). Perspectivas de la revolución boliviana: (La polıt́ica reaccionaria de la Junta Militar conduce a la guerra civil) (in Spanish). Ed. "Masas".
  • Moreno, Pascual Ahumada (1884). Guerra del Pacifico: Recopilacion completa de todos los documentos oficiales, correspondencias i demas publicaciones referentes a la guerra que ha dado a luz la prensa de Chile, Perú i Bolivia, conteniendo documentos ineditos de importancia (in Spanish). Imprenta del Progreso.
  • Quesadas, Juan Isidro (2006). Paseo genealógico por la Argentina y Bolivia (in Spanish). Centro de Genealogía de Entre Ríos. ISBN 978-987-21302-1-3.
  • Ribera, Emilio Durán (1988). La revolución igualitaria de Andrés Ibáñez (in Spanish). Editorial Universitaria.
  • Rojas, Carlos Donoso; Pozo, Gonzalo Serrano del (2011). Chile y la Guerra del Pacífico (in Spanish). Ediciones Centro de Estudios Bicentenario. ISBN 978-956-8979-21-8.
  • Saucedo, Carlos Hugo Molina (2012). Andrés Ibáñez, un caudillo para el siglo XXI: la Comuna de Santa Cruz de la Sierra de 1876 (in Spanish). CIDES-UMSA. ISBN 978-99954-1-460-3.
  • Schelchkov, Andrey (2011). Andrés Ibáñez y la revolución de la igualdad en Santa Cruz: primer ensayo de federalismo en Bolivia, 1876-1877 (in Spanish). Universidad de Santiago de Chile. ISBN 978-956-8416-28-7.
  • Velarde, J. Fellmann (1981). Historia de Bolivia ... Vol. 2.

References

  1. ^ a b Quesada, Juan Isidro (2006). Paseo genealógico por la Argentina y Bolivia (in Spanish). Centro de Genealogía de Entre Ríos. ISBN 978-987-21302-1-3.
  2. ^ Kramer, Pedro (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 3–4.
  3. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 4–5.
  4. ^ Díaz, Julio (1929). Los generales de Bolivia, 1825-1925 (in Spanish). Intendencia general de guerra. p. 287.
  5. ^ Heath, Dwight B. (1972). Historical Dictionary of Bolivia. Scarecrow Press. p. 162. ISBN 978-0-8108-0451-7.
  6. ^ Díaz, Julio (1929). Los generales de Bolivia, 1825-1925 (in Spanish). Intendencia general de guerra. pp. 288–289.
  7. ^ a b c d e Dixon, Jeffrey S.; Sarkees, Meredith Reid (2015-09-18). A Guide to Intra-state Wars: An Examination of Civil, Regional, and Intercommunal Wars, 1816-2014. CQ Press. ISBN 978-1-5063-1798-4.
  8. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 7–9.
  9. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 9–11.
  10. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 14–15.
  11. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. p. 15.
  12. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. p. 16.
  13. ^ Guzmán, Luis M. (1872). Historia de la República de Bolivia desde 1824 (in Spanish). Impr. del Siglo.
  14. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 16–17.
  15. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. p. 18.
  16. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 17–19.
  17. ^ Lora, Guillermo (1964). Perspectivas de la revolución boliviana: (La polıt́ica reaccionaria de la Junta Militar conduce a la guerra civil) (in Spanish). Ed. "Masas". pp. 43–47.
  18. ^ Canales, José Carlos (1947). Mariano Melgarejo: dictator-president of Bolivia, 1864-1871 (in Spanish). University of California. pp. 9–12.
  19. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 19–20.
  20. ^ Canales, José Carlos (1947). Mariano Melgarejo: dictator-president of Bolivia, 1864-1871 (in Spanish). University of California. pp. 166–169.
  21. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 20–21.
  22. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. p. 21.
  23. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 22–25.
  24. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 25–26.
  25. ^ Velarde, J. Fellmann (1981). Historia de Bolivia ... Vol. 2. pp. 27–29.
  26. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. p. 27.
  27. ^ Velarde, J. Fellmann (1981). Historia de Bolivia ... Vol. 2. pp. 35–45.
  28. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 27–28.
  29. ^ Schelchkov, Andrey (2011). Andrés Ibáñez y la revolución de la igualdad en Santa Cruz: primer ensayo de federalismo en Bolivia, 1876-1877 (in Spanish). Universidad de Santiago de Chile. p. 9. ISBN 978-956-8416-28-7.
  30. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 29–30.
  31. ^ Ribera, Emilio Durán (1988). La revolución igualitaria de Andrés Ibáñez (in Spanish). Editorial Universitaria. p. 44.
  32. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 32–33.
  33. ^ Saucedo, Carlos Hugo Molina (2012). Andrés Ibáñez, un caudillo para el siglo XXI: la Comuna de Santa Cruz de la Sierra de 1876 (in Spanish). CIDES-UMSA. p. 72. ISBN 978-99954-1-460-3.
  34. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. p. 33.
  35. ^ Ribera, Emilio Durán (1988). La revolución igualitaria de Andrés Ibáñez (in Spanish). Editorial Universitaria. pp. 49–55.
  36. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. p. 34.
  37. ^ Ribera, Emilio Durán (1988). La revolución igualitaria de Andrés Ibáñez (in Spanish). Editorial Universitaria. p. 60.
  38. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 34–37.
  39. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 36–37.
  40. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 38–39.
  41. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 39–41.
  42. ^ Saucedo, Carlos Hugo Molina (2012). Andrés Ibáñez, un caudillo para el siglo XXI: la Comuna de Santa Cruz de la Sierra de 1876 (in Spanish). CIDES-UMSA. pp. 99–110. ISBN 978-99954-1-460-3.
  43. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 41–42.
  44. ^ Ribera, Emilio Durán (1988). La revolución igualitaria de Andrés Ibáñez (in Spanish). Editorial Universitaria. p. 144.
  45. ^ Schelchkov, Andrey (2011). Andrés Ibáñez y la revolución de la igualdad en Santa Cruz: primer ensayo de federalismo en Bolivia, 1876-1877 (in Spanish). Universidad de Santiago de Chile. p. 29. ISBN 978-956-8416-28-7.
  46. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. p. 42.
  47. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 41–45.
  48. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. p. 46.
  49. ^ Schelchkov, Andrey (2011). Andrés Ibáñez y la revolución de la igualdad en Santa Cruz: primer ensayo de federalismo en Bolivia, 1876-1877 (in Spanish). Universidad de Santiago de Chile. p. 59. ISBN 978-956-8416-28-7.
  50. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 47–48.
  51. ^ Arana, Diego Barros (1979). Historia de la guerra del Pacifico, 1879-1881 (in Spanish). Editorial Andres Bello. pp. 98–106.
  52. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 48–49.
  53. ^ a b c Moreno, Pascual Ahumada (1884). Guerra del Pacifico: Recopilacion completa de todos los documentos oficiales, correspondencias i demas publicaciones referentes a la guerra que ha dado a luz la prensa de Chile, Perú i Bolivia, conteniendo documentos ineditos de importancia (in Spanish). Imprenta del Progreso.
  54. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 49–51.
  55. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 51–53.
  56. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 54–57.
  57. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 57–58.
  58. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 54–59.
  59. ^ Rojas, Carlos Donoso; Pozo, Gonzalo Serrano del (2011). Chile y la Guerra del Pacífico (in Spanish). Ediciones Centro de Estudios Bicentenario. pp. 68–72. ISBN 978-956-8979-21-8.
  60. ^ Arana, Diego Barros (1979). Historia de la guerra del Pacifico, 1879-1881 (in Spanish). Editorial Andres Bello. pp. 160–170.
  61. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 59–61.
  62. ^ Rojas, Carlos Donoso; Pozo, Gonzalo Serrano del (2011). Chile y la Guerra del Pacífico (in Spanish). Ediciones Centro de Estudios Bicentenario. pp. 71–77. ISBN 978-956-8979-21-8.
  63. ^ Arana, Diego Barros (1979). Historia de la guerra del Pacifico, 1879-1881 (in Spanish). Editorial Andres Bello. pp. 179–183.
  64. ^ Rojas, Carlos Donoso; Pozo, Gonzalo Serrano del (2011). Chile y la Guerra del Pacífico (in Spanish). Ediciones Centro de Estudios Bicentenario. pp. 101–103. ISBN 978-956-8979-21-8.
  65. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 61–63.
  66. ^ Arana, Diego Barros (1979). Historia de la guerra del Pacifico, 1879-1881 (in Spanish). Editorial Andres Bello. pp. 229–231.
  67. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. pp. 64–66.
  68. ^ Arana, Diego Barros (1979). Historia de la guerra del Pacifico, 1879-1881 (in Spanish). Editorial Andres Bello. pp. 237–251.
  69. ^ B, Pedro Kramer (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico-biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipográfico-Litográfico. p. 67.
  70. ^ Kramer, Pedro (1898). General Carlos de Villegas: estudio histórico biográfico (in Spanish). Taller Tipo-Litográfico. p. 84.
  71. ^ Díaz, Julio (1929). Los generales de Bolivia, 1825-1925 (in Spanish). Intendencia general de guerra. p. 289.
  72. ^ Quesada, Juan Isidro (2006). Paseo genealógico por la Argentina y Bolivia (in Spanish). Centro de Genealogía de Entre Ríos. ISBN 978-987-21302-1-3.