Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley

1981 United States Supreme Court case
Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley
Argued October 14, 1981
Decided December 14, 1981
Full case nameCitizens Against Rent Control/Coalition for Fair Housing v. City of Berkeley, California
Citations454 U.S. 290 (more)
102 S. Ct. 434; 70 L. Ed. 2d 492; 1981 U.S. LEXIS 135
Case history
Prior27 Cal.3d 819, 614 P.2d 742 (1980).
Holding
The Court struck down state limits on contributions to committees that advocated the passage or defeat of ballot issues as a violation of the First Amendment.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Case opinions
MajorityBurger, joined by Brennan, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens
ConcurrenceRehnquist
ConcurrenceMarshall
ConcurrenceBlackmun, O'Connor
DissentWhite
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. I

Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley, 454 U.S. 290 (1981), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States invalidated a California law that set limits on contributions to ballot issue campaigns. The ruling relies heavily on the Court's earlier decisions in Buckley v. Valeo, holding that limits on contributions to political candidates implicate the First Amendment, and First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, holding that the state governments have no compelling interest in limiting spending on speech about ballot issues.[1]

See also

References

  1. ^ Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley, 454 U.S. 290 (1981).

External links

  • Text of Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley, 454 U.S. 290 (1981) is available from: Cornell  Google Scholar  Justia  Library of Congress  Oyez (oral argument audio) 
  • Supreme Court of California opinion
  • v
  • t
  • e
Public displays
and ceremonies
Statutory religious
exemptions
Public funding
Religion in
public schools
Private religious speech
Internal church affairs
Taxpayer standing
Blue laws
Other
Exclusion of religion
from public benefits
Ministerial exception
Statutory religious exemptions
RFRA
RLUIPA
Unprotected
speech
Incitement
and sedition
Libel and
false speech
Fighting words and
the heckler's veto
True threats
Obscenity
Speech integral
to criminal conduct
Strict scrutiny
Vagueness
Symbolic speech
versus conduct
Content-based
restrictions
Content-neutral
restrictions
In the
public forum
Designated
public forum
Nonpublic
forum
Compelled speech
Compelled subsidy
of others' speech
Compelled representation
Government grants
and subsidies
Government
as speaker
Loyalty oaths
School speech
Public employees
Hatch Act and
similar laws
Licensing and
restriction of speech
Commercial speech
Campaign finance
and political speech
Anonymous speech
State action
Official retaliation
Boycotts
Prisons
Prior restraints
and censorship
Privacy
Taxation and
privileges
Defamation
Broadcast media
Copyrighted materials
Incorporation
Protection from prosecution
and state restrictions
Organizations
Future Conduct
Solicitation
Membership restriction
Primaries and elections


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e