Commissioner v. Wodehouse

1949 United States Supreme Court case
Commissioner v. Wodehouse
Argued December 10–13, 1948
Decided June 13, 1949
Full case nameCommissioner v. Wodehouse
Citations337 U.S. 369 (more)
69 S. Ct. 1120; 93 L. Ed. 1419; 81 U.S.P.Q. 482
Case history
PriorWodehouse v. Commissioner, 8 T.C. 637 (1947); reversed, 166 F.2d 986 (4th Cir. 1948); cert. granted, 335 U.S. 807 (1948).
SubsequentRehearing denied, 338 U.S. 840 (1949).
Holding
Lump sums paid in advance by publications to non-resident aliens are taxable income under the Revenue Act and are indistinguishable from "royalties" paid over time within the meaning of that Act.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Fred M. Vinson
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · Stanley F. Reed
Felix Frankfurter · William O. Douglas
Frank Murphy · Robert H. Jackson
Wiley B. Rutledge · Harold H. Burton
Case opinions
MajorityBurton
DissentFrankfurter, joined by Murphy, Jackson
Laws applied
Revenue Act of 1934, Revenue Act of 1936

Commissioner v. Wodehouse, 337 U.S. 369 (1949), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that lump sums paid in advance by publications to non-resident aliens are taxable income under the Revenue Act and are indistinguishable from "royalties" paid over time within the meaning of that Act.[1]

References

  1. ^ Commissioner v. Wodehouse, 337 U.S. 369 (1949).

External links

  • Text of Commissioner v. Wodehouse, 337 U.S. 369 (1949) is available from: Cornell  Findlaw  Google Scholar  Justia  Library of Congress 
  • v
  • t
  • e
U.S. Supreme Court Article I case law
Enumeration Clause of Section II
Qualifications Clauses of Sections II and III
Elections Clause of Section IV
Origination Clause of Section VII
Presentment Clause of Section VII
Commerce Clause of Section VIII
Dormant Commerce Clause
Others
Coinage Clause of Section VIII
Legal Tender Cases
Copyright Act of 1790
Patent Act of 1793
Patent infringement case law
Patentability case law
Copyright Act of 1831
Copyright Act of 1870
Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890
International Copyright Act of 1891
Copyright Act of 1909
Patent misuse case law
Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914
Lanham Act
Copyright Act of 1976
Other copyright cases
Other patent cases
Other trademark cases
Habeas corpus Suspension Clause of Section IX
No Bills of Attainder or Ex post facto Laws Clause of Section IX
Contract Clause of Section X
Legal Tender Cases
Others
Compact Clause of Section X


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e