Keyishian v. Board of Regents

1967 United States Supreme Court case
Keyishian v. Board of Regents
Argued November 17, 1966
Decided January 23, 1967
Full case nameKeyishian, et al. v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, et al.
Citations385 U.S. 589 (more)
87 S. Ct. 675; 17 L. Ed. 2d 629; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2454
Holding
States cannot prohibit employees from being members of the Communist Party. Such laws are overbroad and too vague.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
Tom C. Clark · John M. Harlan II
William J. Brennan Jr. · Potter Stewart
Byron White · Abe Fortas
Case opinions
MajorityBrennan, joined by Warren, Black, Douglas, Fortas
DissentClark, joined by Harlan, Stewart, White
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. I

Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that states cannot prohibit employees from being members of the Communist Party and that this law was overbroad and too vague.[1]

Background

New York State had laws that prohibited state employees from belonging to any organization that advocated the overthrow of the US government or was "treasonous" or "seditious." The regents of the State University of New York also required teachers and employees to sign an oath that they were not members of the Communist Party.

Some faculty and staff of the university were terminated for refusing to sign the oath and appealed to the Supreme Court.

Decision

The Supreme Court, in a 5–4 decision,[2] overturned the New York state laws prohibiting membership in seditious groups because it was too vague and was overbroad. That largely reversed the 1952 decision in Adler v. Board of Education, in which Irving Adler had been dismissed for the New York City public school system because of a previous connection with the Communist Party USA.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Opinion | DEI Goals Are Worthy. Campus DEI Bureaucracies Fail Them". The Chronicle of Higher Education. March 15, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
  2. ^ Wermiel, Stephen (2009). "Keyishian v. Board of Regents (1967)". The First Amendment Encyclopedia presented by the John Seigenthaler Chair of Excellence in First Amendment Studies. Archived from the original on August 28, 2023. Retrieved August 28, 2023.

External links

  • Works related to Keyishian v. Board of Regents at Wikisource
  • Text of Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 (1967) is available from: Justia  Library of Congress  Oyez (oral argument audio) 
  • Heins, Marjorie. (2012, January 23). "The Keyishian Ruling: 45 Years Later," Academe Blog
  • Wilson, John K. (2012, January 23). "Interview with Harry Keyishian," Academe Blog
  • v
  • t
  • e
State University of New York
Leadership and Governance
Flagship campusesUniversity centersUniversity collegesTechnology collegesCommunity collegesProgramsInstitutesOther
  • Category
    • radio stations
  • List of units
  • Commons
  • v
  • t
  • e
Communist Party USA
Nominees
Presidential
Vice Presidential
Leaders
Prominent members
Litigation
State parties
Current
Defunct
Related articles
  • v
  • t
  • e
Public displays
and ceremonies
Statutory religious
exemptions
Public funding
Religion in
public schools
Private religious speech
Internal church affairs
Taxpayer standing
Blue laws
Other
Exclusion of religion
from public benefits
Ministerial exception
Statutory religious exemptions
RFRA
RLUIPA
Unprotected
speech
Incitement
and sedition
Libel and
false speech
Fighting words and
the heckler's veto
True threats
Obscenity
Speech integral
to criminal conduct
Strict scrutiny
Vagueness
Symbolic speech
versus conduct
Content-based
restrictions
Content-neutral
restrictions
In the
public forum
Designated
public forum
Nonpublic
forum
Compelled speech
Compelled subsidy
of others' speech
Compelled representation
Government grants
and subsidies
Government
as speaker
Loyalty oaths
School speech
Public employees
Hatch Act and
similar laws
Licensing and
restriction of speech
Commercial speech
Campaign finance
and political speech
Anonymous speech
State action
Official retaliation
Boycotts
Prisons
Prior restraints
and censorship
Privacy
Taxation and
privileges
Defamation
Broadcast media
Copyrighted materials
Incorporation
Protection from prosecution
and state restrictions
Organizations
Future Conduct
Solicitation
Membership restriction
Primaries and elections