Method of distinguished element

Method in enumerative combinatorics

In the mathematical field of enumerative combinatorics, identities are sometimes established by arguments that rely on singling out one "distinguished element" of a set.

Definition

Let A {\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}} be a family of subsets of the set A {\displaystyle A} and let x A {\displaystyle x\in A} be a distinguished element of set A {\displaystyle A} . Then suppose there is a predicate P ( X , x ) {\displaystyle P(X,x)} that relates a subset X A {\displaystyle X\subseteq A} to x {\displaystyle x} . Denote A ( x ) {\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}(x)} to be the set of subsets X {\displaystyle X} from A {\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}} for which P ( X , x ) {\displaystyle P(X,x)} is true and A x {\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}-x} to be the set of subsets X {\displaystyle X} from A {\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}} for which P ( X , x ) {\displaystyle P(X,x)} is false, Then A ( x ) {\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}(x)} and A x {\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}-x} are disjoint sets, so by the method of summation, the cardinalities are additive[1]

| A | = | A ( x ) | + | A x | {\displaystyle |{\mathcal {A}}|=|{\mathcal {A}}(x)|+|{\mathcal {A}}-x|}

Thus the distinguished element allows for a decomposition according to a predicate that is a simple form of a divide and conquer algorithm. In combinatorics, this allows for the construction of recurrence relations. Examples are in the next section.

Examples

  • The binomial coefficient ( n k ) {\displaystyle {n \choose k}} is the number of size-k subsets of a size-n set. A basic identity—one of whose consequences is that the binomial coefficients are precisely the numbers appearing in Pascal's triangle—states that:
( n k 1 ) + ( n k ) = ( n + 1 k ) . {\displaystyle {n \choose k-1}+{n \choose k}={n+1 \choose k}.}
Proof: In a size-(n + 1) set, choose one distinguished element. The set of all size-k subsets contains: (1) all size-k subsets that do contain the distinguished element, and (2) all size-k subsets that do not contain the distinguished element. If a size-k subset of a size-(n + 1) set does contain the distinguished element, then its other k − 1 elements are chosen from among the other n elements of our size-(n + 1) set. The number of ways to choose those is therefore ( n k 1 ) {\displaystyle {n \choose k-1}} . If a size-k subset does not contain the distinguished element, then all of its k members are chosen from among the other n "non-distinguished" elements. The number of ways to choose those is therefore ( n k ) {\displaystyle {n \choose k}} .
  • The number of subsets of any size-n set is 2n.
Proof: We use mathematical induction. The basis for induction is the truth of this proposition in case n = 0. The empty set has 0 members and 1 subset, and 20 = 1. The induction hypothesis is the proposition in case n; we use it to prove case n + 1. In a size-(n + 1) set, choose a distinguished element. Each subset either contains the distinguished element or does not. If a subset contains the distinguished element, then its remaining elements are chosen from among the other n elements. By the induction hypothesis, the number of ways to do that is 2n. If a subset does not contain the distinguished element, then it is a subset of the set of all non-distinguished elements. By the induction hypothesis, the number of such subsets is 2n. Finally, the whole list of subsets of our size-(n + 1) set contains 2n + 2n = 2n+1 elements.
  • Let Bn be the nth Bell number, i.e., the number of partitions of a set of n members. Let Cn be the total number of "parts" (or "blocks", as combinatorialists often call them) among all partitions of that set. For example, the partitions of the size-3 set {abc} may be written thus:
a b c a / b c b / a c c / a b a / b / c {\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}abc\\a/bc\\b/ac\\c/ab\\a/b/c\end{matrix}}}
We see 5 partitions, containing 10 blocks, so B3 = 5 and C3 = 10. An identity states:
B n + C n = B n + 1 . {\displaystyle B_{n}+C_{n}=B_{n+1}.}
Proof: In a size-(n + 1) set, choose a distinguished element. In each partition of our size-(n + 1) set, either the distinguished element is a "singleton", i.e., the set containing only the distinguished element is one of the blocks, or the distinguished element belongs to a larger block. If the distinguished element is a singleton, then deletion of the distinguished element leaves a partition of the set containing the n non-distinguished elements. There are Bn ways to do that. If the distinguished element belongs to a larger block, then its deletion leaves a block in a partition of the set containing the n non-distinguished elements. There are Cn such blocks.

See also

  • Combinatorial principles
  • Combinatorial proof

References

  1. ^ Petkovšek, Marko; Tomaž Pisanski (November 2002). "Combinatorial Interpretation of Unsigned Stirling and Lah Numbers" (PDF). University of Ljubljana preprint series. 40 (837): 1–6. Retrieved 12 July 2013.