Pannonian Rusyn

Pannonian Rusyn
Руски язик Ruski jazik
Native to	Serbia Croatia
Ethnicity	Pannonian Rusyns
Native speakers	20,000[citation needed]
Language family	Indo-European Balto-Slavic Slavic West Slavic Czech–Slovak Slovak Eastern Slovak[1] Pannonian Rusyn
Early forms	Proto-Indo-European Proto-Balto-Slavic Proto-Slavic Old Slovak
Writing system	Cyrillic (Pannonian Rusyn alphabet)
Official status
Official language in	Serbia (in Vojvodina)
Regulated by	Statute of Vojvodina
Language codes
ISO 639-3	rsk
Linguist List	rue-par
Glottolog	pann1240  Pannonian Ruthenian
Pannonian Rusyn is classified as Definitely Endangered by the UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger (2010)

Pannonian Rusyn (руски язик, romanized: ruski jazik), also historically referred to as Yugoslav Rusyn, is a variety of the Slovak language, spoken by the Pannonian Rusyns, primarily in the regions of Vojvodina (northern part of modern Serbia) and Slavonia (eastern part of modern Croatia), and also in the Pannonian Rusyn diaspora in the United States and Canada. Since Rusyns are officially recognized as a national minority both in Serbia and Croatia, their language is also recognized as a minority language, and in the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina (Serbia) it is employed as one of six official provincial languages.^[2][3][4]

In some non-Slavic languages, Pannonian Rusyns may be referred to by somewhat archaic exonyms, such as Pannonian Ruthenes or Pannonian Ruthenians, and their language is thus labeled as Pannonian Ruthenian,^[5] but such terminology is not used in the native (Rusyn) language.^[6] Ruthenian exonyms are also viewed as imprecise, since they have several broader meanings, both in terms of their historical uses and ethnic scopes, that are encompassing various East Slavic groups and their languages.^[7][8]

There are several scholarly debates on various linguistic issues related to this language, including the question whether Pannonian Rusyn should be reclassified as a distinct microlanguage, a dialect of Eastern Slovak, or still considered to be just a specific variety of the common Rusyn language, that also has other varieties, spoken by Rusyns in northern (Carpathian) regions, mainly in southwestern Ukraine, northeastern Slovakia, southeastern Poland, and northern Romania.^[9]

Name

Most commonly, native speakers refer to their language simply as Rusky (Ruthenian: руски язик / rusky i͡azik), that renders in English as Rusyn. Sometimes they also use the somewhat archaic term Rusnacky (Ruthenian: руснацки язик / rusnatsky jazyk), that renders in English as Rusnak. These terms are used both by laypersons in daily conversation, and by Pannonian-Rusyn linguists in native-language scholarly works.^[10][11][12]

Since those terms have historically been (and still are) used by Carpathian Rusyns and other East Slavs as endonyms for their own vernacular,^[13] a need emerged for an appropriate adjective to identify this particular linguistic variety. In this spirit, Gabriel Kostelnik proposed the term Bačvansko-Rusky (Ruthenian: бачваньско-руски язик, lit. 'Bačka Rusyn') to refer to the language spoken in the region of Bačka (modern-day Serbia).^[14]

Eventually, the more general term, Bačka-Srem, was adopted by several scholars and thus also encompassed the varieties of the language spoken in the region of Srem (modern-day Serbia and Croatia).^[15][16] Terms such as Vojvodina Rusyn or Vojvodinian Rusyn were alternatively used to refer to all variants in the region of Vojvodina. Even wider term Yugoslav Rusyn was sometimes also used during the existence of former Yugoslavia.^[17]

Finally, during the 1970s and 1980s, Rusyn writer and artist Yulian Kolyesarov proposed the term Panonsko-Rusky (Ruthenian: панонско-руски язик) or Pannonian Rusyn.^[18][19]

In spite of all the aforementioned endonymic tems, some modern authors still opt to use those based on the exonymic term Ruthenian. Since native speakers do not use Ruthenian or related terms for self-identification in their own language,^[6] such terms are likewise not used in works written in the native language. Still, the terms are employed by some authors in various English-language and non-Slavic works; sometimes in a very general manner. For instance, instead of using regional identifiers (such as Pannonian Ruthenian, corresponding to Pannonian Rusyn), several of these authors have begun to simply designate that linguistic variety solely as Ruthenian, excluding any regional or other adjectives.^[20][21][22]

Thus, a peculiar terminological situation has emerged as the term Ruthenian language already has a specific and well-established meaning in both traditional and scientific contexts and primarily refers to late medieval and early modern varieties of East Slavic as were spoken in the regions of modern-day Ukraine, Belarus from the 15th until 18th centuries.^[23] More recently in the former Austro-Hungarian Monarchy, the corresponding term (German: ruthenische Sprache) was employed until 1918 as the official exonymic term for the entire body of East Slavic languages within the borders of the Monarchy.^[24]

ISO 639-3 Identifier

On January 20, 2022, the ISO 639-3 identifier, rsk, and language names, Rusyn and Ruthenian, were approved for Pannonian Rusyn by ISO. The change followed a November 2020 request by a group of linguists (including Aleksandr Dulichenko) in which ISO was asked to recognize Pannonian Rusyn as distinct and separate from Carpathian Rusyn and to issue it the new ISO 639-3 identifier, Ruthenian language (with the additional name, Rusnak).^[25][26]

This ISO update is the latest development since a 2019 proposal from a smaller group of those same linguists which similarly requested suppression of the code, rue, and division of Rusyn language into two distinct languages: the East Rusyn language (Carpathian Rusyn) and the South Rusyn language (Pannonian Rusyn). However, in January 2020, ISO authorities rejected the request.^[27]

As explained earlier, term Ruthenian language already has a specific and well-established meaning. However, the additional term, Rusnak, also has a wider connotation as it is a traditional endonym for all Rusyns (whether in Pannonia or Carpathian Rus').^[28][29] The effects of the adoption of these terms for Pannonian Rusyn by ISO (if any) remain to be seen.

Classification

Pannonian Rusyn has recently been treated as a separate language from Carpatho-Rusyn. By some scholars, mainly American scholars, Pannonian Rusyn has been treated as a West Slavic language, and Carpatho-Rusyn as an East Slavic language, which would make Pannonian Rusyn the only West Slavic language to use the Cyrillic script.

In the ISO 639-9 identifier application for Pannonian Rusyn (or "Ruthenian" as it is referred to in that document), the authors note that "Ruthenian is closest to [a] linguistic entity sometimes called [Slovak: východoslovenský; Pan. Rusyn: виходнярски, lit. 'East Slovak'],^[i] ... (the speeches of Trebišov and Prešov [districts])."^[30]

Though Pannonian Rusyn shares most of its linguistic features with these Eastern Slovak dialects, it shares nine features which are exclusive to South-West Zemplin (Trebišov) Eastern Slovak varieties:^[30]

• Reflexes *ĕ (e.g. сушед, sushed, 'neighbor'; хлєб, khl'eb, 'bread'; шедзиц, shedzits, 'sit');

• Reflexes *ḷ (e.g. полни, polni, 'full'; волна, volna, 'wool'; жолти, zholti, 'yellow');

• Distribution o < *ō/*ŏ (e.g. вол, vol, 'ox'; мой, moi, 'my'; ровни, rovni, 'flat');

• The distribution of e < *ē/*ě (e.g. корень, koren', 'root'; седем, sedem, 'seven'; зберац, zberats, 'collect');

• Change of *s > sh/ш and *z > zh/ж and the absence of phonemes ś and ź (e.g. шестра, shestra, 'sister'; єшень, ieshen', 'fall'; желєни, zhel'eni, 'green');

• The presence of hard consonant groups shch/щ and zhdzh/ждж (e.g. щесце, shchestse, 'happiness'; щири, shchiri, 'honest'; гвижджиц, hvizhdzhits, 'whistle');

• The dative and the locative singular forms of feminine nouns with the ending -a in the nominative singular form (e.g. о мухи, o mukhi, 'about fly'; у миски, u miski, 'in dish'; на драги, na drahi, 'on road');

• Infinitive endings and final -chits/-чиц (печиц, pechits, 'bake'; чечиц, chechits, 'flow');

• Lexical elements (e.g. мац, mats, 'mother'; kukovka/куковка "cuckoo", тидзень, tidzen', 'week'; цо, tsо, 'what').

Pannonian Rusyn also shares three features unique to South-East Šariš (Prešov) Eastern Slоvаk varieties:^[30]

• The presence of certain forms of the auxiliary verb буц, buts, 'be' (e.g. сом, som, 'am'; ши, shi, 'are'; etc.) and the formation of negative forms (e.g. нє сом, n'e som, 'am not'; нє є, n'e ie, 'is not'; etc.);

• Formation of masculine singular participle with the formant -l/-л for the verbs having the infinitive base in consonant (e.g. плетол, pl'etol, 'he knitted' везол, vezol, 'he drove') and forms in the final -nul/-нул (e.g. спаднул, spadnul, 'he fell'; шеднул, shednul, 'he sat');

• Lexical elements (e.g. угел, uhel, 'corner'; гумно, humno, 'yard').

Dulichenko^[31] аlsо states that East Slovak features predominate both and on phonological and morphological level. He points to the following phonological features:^[30]

• Stress in Ruthenian is always on penultimate syllable; Dulichenko connects this feature with Polish, although it is present in all Eastern Slovak speeches;

• Initial e > ie/є (e.g. єден, ieden, 'one'; єшень, ieshen', 'fall'; єлень, ielen', 'deer');

• i = y/и = ы (e.g. мили, mili, 'dear'; штири, shtiri, 'four'; мидло, midlo, 'soap'; дим, dim, 'smoke');

• dj > dz (e.g. цудзи, tsudzi, 'foreign'; садза, sadza, 'soot'; одредзиц, odredzits, 'determine'); tj > c (ts) (e.g. вецей, vetsei, 'more'; ноц, nots, 'night'; моц, mots, 'power');

• z' > (ź) > zh/ж (e.g. жвир, zhvir, 'beast'; жридло, zhridlo, 'spring'; boiazhl'ivi/бояжлїви "afraid"); s' > (ś) > sh/ш (e.g. шено, sheno, 'hay'; шестра, shestra, 'sister'; дзешец, dzeshets, 'ten');

• The Proto-Slavic consonant groups *dl and *tl are preserved (e.g. zubadlo/зубадло "(artificial) teeth", ковадло, kovadlo, 'anvil'; садло, sadlo, 'lard'; stretla/стретла "she met");

• gvi > hvi (e.g. гвизда, hvizda, 'star'; гвиздац, hvizdats, 'whistle'); kvi > kvi (e.g. квице, kvitse, 'flower'; квитнуц, kvitnuts, 'bloom');

• Absence of epenthesis l'/л (е.g. зарабяц, zarabiats, 'earn'; охабяц, ochabiats, 'leave'; любени, l'ubeni, 'loved').
• Proto-Slavic groups -ort and -olt became groups rot- and lot- (e.g. локец, lokets, 'elbow'; ровни, rovni, 'flat'; роснуц, rosnuts, 'grow');
• The below Protoslavic groups changed in the same manner as in West and South Slavic languages. In contrast, these groups became torot, tolot, teret, tolot (e.g. boroda, poroch, korova; holova, boloto, holod; bereh, pered, vereteno; moloko, polot', polova) in East Slavic languages.
  • tort became trat (e.g. брада, brada, 'beard'; прах, prach, 'dust'; крава, krava, 'cow');
  • tolt became tlat (e.g. глава, hlava, 'head'; блато, blato, 'mud'; злато, zlato, 'gold');
  • tert became tret (e.g. брег, breh, 'hill'; пред, pred, 'before'; вреценко, vretsenko, 'spindle');
  • telt became tlet (e.g. млєко, ml'еко, 'milk'; плєц, pl'ets, 'weed'; плєва, pl'eva, 'chaff').

Dulichenko also notes that Pannonian Rusyn shares the following morphological features with East Slovak dialects:^[30]

• The nominative singular of nouns of neuter gender on a soft stem is formed by the ending -o (e.g.морйо, morio, 'sea'; шерцо, shertso, 'heart'; польо, pol'o, 'field');

• The instrumental singular of nouns of feminine gender is formed by the ending -u/-у (e.g.з мацеру, z matseru, 'with mother'; над воду, nad vodu, 'above water');

• The genitive plural and locative plural (vocative plural for nouns pertaining to animate thing) of nouns are formed by the ending -okh/-ох (e.g. [shpiv] ptitsokh/[шпив] птицох "singing of birds", [brekh] psokh/[брех] псох "barking of dogs", до очох, do ochokh, 'to the eyes');

• The dative plural of nouns formed by the ending -om/-ом (e.g. gu bradlom/ґу брадлом "to the heaps", vel'овельо щесца нашим дзецом, shchestsa nashim dzetsom, 'a lot of luck to our children');

• The instrumental plural ending: a) of adjectives (e.g.з добрима дзецми, z dobrima dzetsmi, 'with good children'; з тлустима женами, z tlustima zhenami, 'with fat women'); b) of possessive, interrogative, demonstrative and personal pronouns of the third person plural (e.g.з моїма шестрами, z moima shestrami, 'with my sisters'; пред котрима, pred kotrima, 'in front of which'; з нїма, z n'ima, 'with them');

• The nominative plural ending -o a) of possessive pronouns (e.g.мойо кнїжки, moio kn'izhki, 'my books'); b) of possessive adjectives (e. g. shestrino chustochki/шестрино хусточки "sister's kerchiefs);

• The ending -m/-м for the first person singular of the Present Tense (e.g.я шпивам, ia shpivam, 'I sing'; я идзем, ia idzem, 'I go'; я читам, ia chitam, 'I read');

• The ending -me/-ме for the first person plural of the Present Tense (e.g.ми нєшеме, mi n'esheme, 'we carry'; ми пишеме, mi pisheme, 'we write'; ми читаме, mi chitame, 'we read');

• The endings -a, -'a, -u, -'u/-а, -я, -у, -ю for the third person plural of the Present Tense (e.g.вони правя, voni pravia, 'they make'; вони глєдаю, voni hl'edaiu, 'they search');

• The reflexive particle she/ше is weakly related to a verb and can proceed it (e.g.я ше нє мишам з таким шветом, ia she n'e misham z takim shvetom, 'I do not mix with people like that');

• The system of forms of the auxiliary verb buts (som, shi, ie, zme, stse, su)/буц (сом, ши, є, зме, сце, су);

• The conjunction zhe/же in the dependent clause (e.g. ia znam zhe …/я знам же ... "I know that ...").

Classification as West Slavic