Project Jefferson

Covert program by the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency

Project Jefferson was a covert U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency program designed to determine if the current anthrax vaccine was effective against genetically modified bacteria. The program's legal status under the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) is disputed.[citation needed]

History

The operation

Project Jefferson began in 1997[1] and was designed to reproduce a strain of genetically modified anthrax isolated by Russian scientists during the 1990s.[2] The goal was to determine whether or not the strain was resistant to the commercially available U.S. anthrax vaccine.[2]

Reportage

The project was disclosed in a September 4, 2001 article in The New York Times.[3][4] Reporters Judith Miller, Stephen Engelberg and William J. Broad collaborated to write the article.[3] It is presumed that the reporters had knowledge of the program for at least several months; shortly after the article appeared they published a book that detailed the story further.[3] The 2001 book, Germs: Biological Weapons and America's Secret War, and the article are the only publicly available sources[citation needed] detailing Project Jefferson and its sister projects, Bacchus and Clear Vision.[3]

Legality

Project Jefferson was operated by the Defense Intelligence Agency and reviewed by lawyers at the Pentagon.[4] Those lawyers determined that Project Jefferson was in line with the BWC.[4] Despite assertions from the Clinton and Bush administrations that the project, and its sisters, were legal, several international legal scholars disagreed.[2]

Notable was the fact that the clandestine program was omitted from BWC confidence-building measure (CBM) declarations.[2] These measures were introduced to the BWC in 1986 and 1991 to strengthen the treaty, the U.S. had long been a proponent of their value and some asserted[who?] that these tests damaged American credibility.[2] U.S. desire to keep such programs secret was, according to Bush administration officials, a "significant reason" that Bush rejected a draft agreement signed by 143 nations to strengthen the BWC.[4]

References

  1. ^ "Pentagon Press Briefing on Biological Weapons Research".
  2. ^ a b c d e Tucker, Jonathan B. "Biological Threat Assessment: Is the Cure Worse Than the Disease? Archived 2008-05-17 at the Wayback Machine", Arms Control Today, October 2004. Retrieved January 6, 2009.
  3. ^ a b c d Enemark, Christian. Disease and Security: Natural Plagues and Biological Weapons in East Asia, (Google Books), Routledge, 2007, pp. 173-75, (ISBN 0415422345).
  4. ^ a b c d Miller, Judith, Engelberg, Stephen and Broad, William J. "U.S. Germ Warfare Research Pushes Treaty Limits", The New York Times, September 4, 2001. Retrieved January 6, 2009.

Further reading

  • Miller, Judith, Engelberg, Stephen and Broad, William J. Germs: Biological Weapons and America's Secret War, (Google Books), Simon and Schuster, 2002, (ISBN 0684871599).
  • Thor Duffin, The Jefferson Project, Steinwald Books, 2010, (ISBN 978-0615371276)
  • v
  • t
  • e
Organizations
Federal
administrative
DHS
DNI
DHHS
DoD
Federal
research
Trans-
departmental
Military
Civilian
Response
Local
State
Federal
Non-
governmental
Academic centers
and think tanks
Government
contractors
Programs
and projects
Threat reduction
Biosurveillance
  • National Biosurveillance Strategy
  • Laboratory Response Network (CDC)
  • BioWatch (EPA, CDC)
  • Global Bio-Surveillance Technology Initiative (GBTI), Bio-Surveillance Management Office (BMO) (part of JPEO-CBD)
  • ESSENCE (DoD)
  • RODS (Civilian)
Biosecurity/Biosurety
Medical intelligence
Disaster response
Technology
and equipment
Protection
Detection
Biocontainment
Law
Treaties
Legislation
International
representationHistory
Past biological
incidents
Defunct organizations
and programs
Related topics