Robert K. C. Forman : Criticism, Books Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Robert K. C. Forman

(Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Robert K. C. Forman, is a former professor of religion at the City University of New York, author of several studies on religious experience, and co-editor of the Journal of Consciousness Studies.

Forman has worked as professor of religion at City University of New York, both Hunter College and City College, and is Founding Executive Director of The Forge Institute for Spirituality and Social Change. His books include The Problems of Pure Consciousness, The Innate Capacity and "Enlightenment Ain't What It's Cracked Up to Be".

Criticism

Lola Williamson has criticized Forman's description of transcendence as "a state of wakeful though contentless existence". Based on interviews with transcendental meditation practitioners, she notes that those transcendent experiences show variations between practitioners, and are also not contentless.^[1]

Yaroslav Komarovski (2015) notes that Forman's notion of a "pure consciousness event" (PCE) has a very limited applicability in Tibetan Buddhism. According to Komarovski, the realization of emptiness as described in the Buddhist Madhyamaka tradition is different from the PCE. Not only the realization itself is different, but also the causes and the subsequent influence on the personality. According to Komarovski, it is brought about by specific Buddhist techniques, and results in specific Buddhist objectives, thereby illustrating the opposite of what Forman argues. According to Komarovski, to force the PCE into the spectrum of Tibetan Buddhist practices, it would be, at best, one of the minor events, and not the key mystical experience. Rather, according to Komarvski, "certain experiences and mental states adresses by Tibetan thinkers are treated as PCE due to an oversimplification of and confusion about the nature of those experiences."^[2]

Books

Forman, R.K.C. (ed.) (1990). The Problem of Pure Consciousness: Mysticism and Philosophy. Oxford University Press.^[3]

Forman, R.K.C. (1994). (ed.) Meister Eckhart: Mystic as Theologian: An Experiment in Methodology. Rockport, MASSACHUSETTS: Houghton Mifflin. (Published by Element in 1991).

Forman, R.K.C. (1997). Mysticism, Mind, Consciousness. New York: State University of New York Press^[4]

Forman, R.K.C. (ed.). (1998). The Innate Capacity: Mysticism, Philosophy and Psychology. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.^[5]

Forman, R.K.C., Wilber, K. & Andresen, J. (2000). Cognitive Models and Spi Maps: Interdisciplinary Explorations of Religious Experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies. Imprint Academic.

Forman, R.K.C. (2004). Grassroots Spirituality: What It Is, Why It Is Here, Where It Is Going. Exeter and Charlottesville: Imprint Academic. ^[6]

Forman, R.K.C. (2011). Enlightenment Ain't What It's Cracked Up To Be. John Hunt, UK. O-Books.

References

^ Williamson, Lola (2010), Transcendent in America: Hindu-Inspired Meditation Movements as New Religion, NYU Press, p. 174
^ Komarovski, Yaroslav (2015), Tibetan Buddhism and Mystical Experience, Oxford University Press, pp. 76–78
^
Reviews of The Problem of Pure Consciousness:
- Daniel Barbiero, Philosophy East and West, doi:10.2307/1399217, JSTOR 1399217
- Ramakrishna Puligandla, Philosophy East and West, JSTOR 1400154
^
Reviews of Mysticism, Mind, Consciousness:
- Martin Adam, Arc: The Journal of the School of Religious Studies, [1]
- Bruce K. Hanson, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, JSTOR 1466592
- Dan Merkur, Religion, doi:10.1006/reli.2000.0253
^ Review of The Innate Capacity: Matthew C. Bagger, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, doi:10.2307/1387614, JSTOR 1387614
^
Reviews of Grassroots Spirituality:
- Karen Lord, Implicit Religion, doi:10.1558/imre.v8i3.331
- Jenny Rolph, Mental Health, Religion & Culture, doi:10.1080/13674676.2010.481838
- Travis Webster, Journal of Religion and Popular Culture, ProQuest 232425594