Schrödinger–HJW theorem

Concept in quantum information theory

In quantum information theory and quantum optics, the Schrödinger–HJW theorem is a result about the realization of a mixed state of a quantum system as an ensemble of pure quantum states and the relation between the corresponding purifications of the density operators. The theorem is named after physicists and mathematicians Erwin Schrödinger,[1] Lane P. Hughston, Richard Jozsa and William Wootters.[2] The result was also found independently (albeit partially) by Nicolas Gisin,[3] and by Nicolas Hadjisavvas building upon work by Ed Jaynes,[4][5] while a significant part of it was likewise independently discovered by N. David Mermin.[6] Thanks to its complicated history, it is also known by various other names such as the GHJW theorem,[7] the HJW theorem, and the purification theorem.

Purification of a mixed quantum state

Let H S {\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}_{S}} be a finite-dimensional complex Hilbert space, and consider a generic (possibly mixed) quantum state ρ {\displaystyle \rho } defined on H S {\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}_{S}} and admitting a decomposition of the form

ρ = i p i | ϕ i ϕ i | {\displaystyle \rho =\sum _{i}p_{i}|\phi _{i}\rangle \langle \phi _{i}|}
for a collection of (not necessarily mutually orthogonal) states | ϕ i H S {\displaystyle |\phi _{i}\rangle \in {\mathcal {H}}_{S}} and coefficients p i 0 {\displaystyle p_{i}\geq 0} such that i p i = 1 {\textstyle \sum _{i}p_{i}=1} . Note that any quantum state can be written in such a way for some { | ϕ i } i {\displaystyle \{|\phi _{i}\rangle \}_{i}} and { p i } i {\displaystyle \{p_{i}\}_{i}} .[8]

Any such ρ {\displaystyle \rho } can be purified, that is, represented as the partial trace of a pure state defined in a larger Hilbert space. More precisely, it is always possible to find a (finite-dimensional) Hilbert space H A {\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}_{A}} and a pure state | Ψ S A H S H A {\displaystyle |\Psi _{SA}\rangle \in {\mathcal {H}}_{S}\otimes {\mathcal {H}}_{A}} such that ρ = Tr A ( | Ψ S A Ψ S A | ) {\displaystyle \rho =\operatorname {Tr} _{A}{\big (}|\Psi _{SA}\rangle \langle \Psi _{SA}|{\big )}} . Furthermore, the states | Ψ S A {\displaystyle |\Psi _{SA}\rangle } satisfying this are all and only those of the form

| Ψ S A = i p i | ϕ i | a i {\displaystyle |\Psi _{SA}\rangle =\sum _{i}{\sqrt {p_{i}}}|\phi _{i}\rangle \otimes |a_{i}\rangle }
for some orthonormal basis { | a i } i H A {\displaystyle \{|a_{i}\rangle \}_{i}\subset {\mathcal {H}}_{A}} . The state | Ψ S A {\displaystyle |\Psi _{SA}\rangle } is then referred to as the "purification of ρ {\displaystyle \rho } ". Since the auxiliary space and the basis can be chosen arbitrarily, the purification of a mixed state is not unique; in fact, there are infinitely many purifications of a given mixed state.[9] Because all of them admit a decomposition in the form given above, given any pair of purifications | Ψ , | Ψ H S H A {\displaystyle |\Psi \rangle ,|\Psi '\rangle \in {\mathcal {H}}_{S}\otimes {\mathcal {H}}_{A}} , there is always some unitary operation U : H A H A {\displaystyle U:{\mathcal {H}}_{A}\to {\mathcal {H}}_{A}} such that
| Ψ = ( I U ) | Ψ . {\displaystyle |\Psi '\rangle =(I\otimes U)|\Psi \rangle .}

Theorem

Consider a mixed quantum state ρ {\displaystyle \rho } with two different realizations as ensemble of pure states as ρ = i p i | ϕ i ϕ i | {\textstyle \rho =\sum _{i}p_{i}|\phi _{i}\rangle \langle \phi _{i}|} and ρ = j q j | φ j φ j | {\textstyle \rho =\sum _{j}q_{j}|\varphi _{j}\rangle \langle \varphi _{j}|} . Here both | ϕ i {\displaystyle |\phi _{i}\rangle } and | φ j {\displaystyle |\varphi _{j}\rangle } are not assumed to be mutually orthogonal. There will be two corresponding purifications of the mixed state ρ {\displaystyle \rho } reading as follows:

Purification 1: | Ψ S A 1 = i p i | ϕ i | a i {\displaystyle |\Psi _{SA}^{1}\rangle =\sum _{i}{\sqrt {p_{i}}}|\phi _{i}\rangle \otimes |a_{i}\rangle } ;
Purification 2: | Ψ S A 2 = j q j | φ j | b j {\displaystyle |\Psi _{SA}^{2}\rangle =\sum _{j}{\sqrt {q_{j}}}|\varphi _{j}\rangle \otimes |b_{j}\rangle } .

The sets { | a i } {\displaystyle \{|a_{i}\rangle \}} and { | b j } {\displaystyle \{|b_{j}\rangle \}} are two collections of orthonormal bases of the respective auxiliary spaces. These two purifications only differ by a unitary transformation acting on the auxiliary space, namely, there exists a unitary matrix U A {\displaystyle U_{A}} such that | Ψ S A 1 = ( I U A ) | Ψ S A 2 {\displaystyle |\Psi _{SA}^{1}\rangle =(I\otimes U_{A})|\Psi _{SA}^{2}\rangle } .[10] Therefore, | Ψ S A 1 = j q j | φ j U A | b j {\textstyle |\Psi _{SA}^{1}\rangle =\sum _{j}{\sqrt {q_{j}}}|\varphi _{j}\rangle \otimes U_{A}|b_{j}\rangle } , which means that we can realize the different ensembles of a mixed state just by making different measurements on the purifying system.

References

  1. ^ Schrödinger, Erwin (1936). "Probability relations between separated systems". Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 32 (3): 446–452. Bibcode:1936PCPS...32..446S. doi:10.1017/S0305004100019137.
  2. ^ Hughston, Lane P.; Jozsa, Richard; Wootters, William K. (November 1993). "A complete classification of quantum ensembles having a given density matrix". Physics Letters A. 183 (1): 14–18. Bibcode:1993PhLA..183...14H. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(93)90880-9. ISSN 0375-9601.
  3. ^ Gisin, N. (1989). “Stochastic quantum dynamics and relativity”, Helvetica Physica Acta 62, 363–371.
  4. ^ Hadjisavvas, Nicolas (1981). "Properties of mixtures on non-orthogonal states". Letters in Mathematical Physics. 5 (4): 327–332. Bibcode:1981LMaPh...5..327H. doi:10.1007/BF00401481.
  5. ^ Jaynes, E. T. (1957). "Information theory and statistical mechanics. II". Physical Review. 108 (2): 171–190. Bibcode:1957PhRv..108..171J. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.108.171.
  6. ^ Fuchs, Christopher A. (2011). Coming of Age with Quantum Information: Notes on a Paulian Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-19926-1. OCLC 535491156.
  7. ^ Mermin, N. David (1999). "What Do These Correlations Know about Reality? Nonlocality and the Absurd". Foundations of Physics. 29 (4): 571–587. arXiv:quant-ph/9807055. Bibcode:1998quant.ph..7055M. doi:10.1023/A:1018864225930.
  8. ^ Nielsen, Michael A.; Chuang, Isaac L., "The Schmidt decomposition and purifications", Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 110–111.
  9. ^ Watrous, John (2018). The Theory of Quantum Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316848142. ISBN 978-1-107-18056-7.
  10. ^ Kirkpatrick, K. A. (February 2006). "The Schrödinger-HJW Theorem". Foundations of Physics Letters. 19 (1): 95–102. arXiv:quant-ph/0305068. Bibcode:2006FoPhL..19...95K. doi:10.1007/s10702-006-1852-1. ISSN 0894-9875.
  • v
  • t
  • e
GeneralTheoremsQuantum
communication
Quantum cryptography
Quantum algorithmsQuantum
complexity theoryQuantum
processor benchmarksQuantum
computing modelsQuantum
error correctionPhysical
implementations
Quantum optics
Ultracold atoms
Spin-based
Superconducting
Quantum
programming
  • Quantum information science
  • Quantum mechanics topics