Second colonial occupation

Phase of British colonial rule in Sub-Saharan Africa after 1945
A European instructor lectures African students on the functioning of a steam engine in East Africa, c.1950

Second colonial occupation is a term coined by the historians Anthony Low and John Lonsdale to describe the phase of British colonial rule in Sub-Saharan Africa beginning in the aftermath of World War II. It was characterised by "a great intensification of government activity" and new focus on economic development.

Low and Lonsdale originally coined the term in the edited volume History of East Africa (1976) to refer to a specific period in the history of Britain's colonies in East Africa. The term has subsequently been widely applied by other historians as a form of periodisation in other historical contexts, although primarily within the historiography of Sub-Saharan Africa.

Concept

According to Anthony Low and John Lonsdale, the "second colonial occupation" represented a distinct period in British colonial rule which began after World War II, running approximately from 1945 to 1963, which followed a first "occupation" that had lost momentum after the era of New Imperialism.[1] This argument was first made in an article entitled "East Africa: Towards a New Order, 1945-1963", published in the third volume of the History of East Africa (1976). Low and Lonsdale wrote:

From the late 1940s there was a great intensification of government activity throughout British Africa; in contrast to earlier years, and to the recent war period when territories were drained of staff, this access of official energy amounted to a second colonial occupation. It had a variety of causes.[2]

According to Low and Lonsdale, the first "colonial occupation" had occurred at the time of colonial conquest in the era of New Imperialism which had based claims for colonial sovereignty on effective occupation of territory before World War I. As a result of budgetary constraints and the Great Depression, colonial administration had become increasingly reliant on simple extraction of resources and on indirect rule. This meant that the number of European administrators, employees, and officials could be kept low.

The British Empire accumulated significant dollar-denominated debts to the United States during World War II. As such, it was necessary to reduce foreign-currency imports and believed that colonial agricultural produce could replace products previously acquired overseas. This would involve a restructuring of African economies "in the interests of the British consumer", a process which would require greater investment in terms of manpower and investment.[3] Large numbers of European experts, such as agronomists and anthropologists, were recruited to improve African agricultural processes and the state invested in large centrally planned economic projects such as the Tanganyika groundnut scheme (1947–52). This led to unprecedented state interference in the day-to-day lives of the colonial population, especially peasants, helping to drive the emergence of popular African anti-colonial nationalism.

The move towards "development" or "trusteeship" in colonial policy is often traced to the Colonial Development and Welfare Act 1940 or the wartime ideals exemplified by the Atlantic Charter.[4] It has been argued that there was a continuity between the ethos of the second colonial occupation and the post-colonial focus on economic development.[5]

See also

References

  1. ^ Utietiang Ukelina 2017, p. xviii.
  2. ^ Low & Lonsdale 1991, p. 173.
  3. ^ J. McCracken, (2012). A History of Malawi, 1859–1966 Woodbridge, James Currey p. 237.
  4. ^ Utietiang Ukelina 2017, p. xx.
  5. ^ Utietiang Ukelina 2017, p. xxvi.

Bibliography

  • Utietiang Ukelina, Bekeh (2017). The Second Colonial Occupation: Development Planning, Agriculture, and the Legacies of British Colonial Rule in Nigeria. Lanham: Lexington Books. ISBN 9781498529242.
  • Low, D.A.; Lonsdale, J.M. (1991). "East Africa: Towards a New Order, 1945-1963". Eclipse of Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780511563096. (reprint of the 1976 article)

Further reading

  • Low, D.A.; Lonsdale, J.M., eds. (1976). "Towards the New Order, 1945–63". History of East Africa. Vol. 3. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Hodge, Joseph Morgan (2007). Triumph of the expert : Agrarian doctrines of development and the legacies of British colonialism. Athens: Ohio University Press. ISBN 978-0-8214-1717-1.
  • v
  • t
  • e
  • historians
  • historicity
  • history
  • theories of history
Types
Sources
By scale
By source
By topic
Approaches,
schools
Concepts
General
Specific
Periodization of
modern history
By country or region
Africa
Americas
Latin America
United States
Eurasia
Ancient Rome
China
France
  • Cordon sanitaire
  • Frankish Interregnum [fr]
  • Grand Siècle
  • Legendary Saracen [fr]
  • Location of Alésia [fr]
  • Lyon [fr]
Germany
India
Ireland
Poland
Russia
Spain
Turkey
United
Kingdom
British
Empire
Oceania
By war, conflict
pre-18th century
conflicts
18th and 19th
century conflicts
Coalition Wars
(1792–1815)
World War I
Treaty of
Versailles
Interwar period
World War II
Eastern Front
The Holocaust
Pacific War
Western Front
Cold War
Post-Cold War
By person
Political
leaders
Historical
rankings
Others
Other topics
Economics
Religion
Science /
Technology
Organizations, publications
  • Category
  • Multimedia