Supercompact cardinal

In set theory, a supercompact cardinal is a type of large cardinal independently introduced by Solovay and Reinhardt.[1] They display a variety of reflection properties.

Formal definition

If λ {\displaystyle \lambda } is any ordinal, κ {\displaystyle \kappa } is λ {\displaystyle \lambda } -supercompact means that there exists an elementary embedding j {\displaystyle j} from the universe V {\displaystyle V} into a transitive inner model M {\displaystyle M} with critical point κ {\displaystyle \kappa } , j ( κ ) > λ {\displaystyle j(\kappa )>\lambda } and

λ M M . {\displaystyle {}^{\lambda }M\subseteq M\,.}

That is, M {\displaystyle M} contains all of its λ {\displaystyle \lambda } -sequences. Then κ {\displaystyle \kappa } is supercompact means that it is λ {\displaystyle \lambda } -supercompact for all ordinals λ {\displaystyle \lambda } .

Alternatively, an uncountable cardinal κ {\displaystyle \kappa } is supercompact if for every A {\displaystyle A} such that | A | κ {\displaystyle \vert A\vert \geq \kappa } there exists a normal measure over [ A ] < κ {\displaystyle [A]^{<\kappa }} , in the following sense.

[ A ] < κ {\displaystyle [A]^{<\kappa }} is defined as follows:

[ A ] < κ := { x A | x | < κ } {\displaystyle [A]^{<\kappa }:=\{x\subseteq A\mid \vert x\vert <\kappa \}} .

An ultrafilter U {\displaystyle U} over [ A ] < κ {\displaystyle [A]^{<\kappa }} is fine if it is κ {\displaystyle \kappa } -complete and { x [ A ] < κ a x } U {\displaystyle \{x\in [A]^{<\kappa }\mid a\in x\}\in U} , for every a A {\displaystyle a\in A} . A normal measure over [ A ] < κ {\displaystyle [A]^{<\kappa }} is a fine ultrafilter U {\displaystyle U} over [ A ] < κ {\displaystyle [A]^{<\kappa }} with the additional property that every function f : [ A ] < κ A {\displaystyle f:[A]^{<\kappa }\to A} such that { x [ A ] < κ | f ( x ) x } U {\displaystyle \{x\in [A]^{<\kappa }|f(x)\in x\}\in U} is constant on a set in U {\displaystyle U} . Here "constant on a set in U {\displaystyle U} " means that there is a A {\displaystyle a\in A} such that { x [ A ] < κ | f ( x ) = a } U {\displaystyle \{x\in [A]^{<\kappa }|f(x)=a\}\in U} .

Properties

Supercompact cardinals have reflection properties. If a cardinal with some property (say a 3-huge cardinal) that is witnessed by a structure of limited rank exists above a supercompact cardinal κ {\displaystyle \kappa } , then a cardinal with that property exists below κ {\displaystyle \kappa } . For example, if κ {\displaystyle \kappa } is supercompact and the generalized continuum hypothesis (GCH) holds below κ {\displaystyle \kappa } then it holds everywhere because a bijection between the powerset of ν {\displaystyle \nu } and a cardinal at least ν + + {\displaystyle \nu ^{++}} would be a witness of limited rank for the failure of GCH at ν {\displaystyle \nu } so it would also have to exist below ν {\displaystyle \nu } .

Finding a canonical inner model for supercompact cardinals is one of the major problems of inner model theory.

The least supercompact cardinal is the least κ {\displaystyle \kappa } such that for every structure ( M , R 1 , , R n ) {\displaystyle (M,R_{1},\ldots ,R_{n})} with cardinality of the domain | M | κ {\displaystyle \vert M\vert \geq \kappa } , and for every Π 1 1 {\displaystyle \Pi _{1}^{1}} sentence ϕ {\displaystyle \phi } such that ( M , R 1 , , R n ) ϕ {\displaystyle (M,R_{1},\ldots ,R_{n})\vDash \phi } , there exists a substructure ( M , R 1 | M , , R n | M ) {\displaystyle (M',R_{1}\vert M,\ldots ,R_{n}\vert M)} with smaller domain (i.e. | M | < | M | {\displaystyle \vert M'\vert <\vert M\vert } ) that satisfies ϕ {\displaystyle \phi } .[2]

Supercompactness has a combinatorial characterization similar to the property of being ineffable. Let P κ ( A ) {\displaystyle P_{\kappa }(A)} be the set of all nonempty subsets of A {\displaystyle A} which have cardinality < κ {\displaystyle <\kappa } . A cardinal κ {\displaystyle \kappa } is supercompact iff for every set A {\displaystyle A} (equivalently every cardinal α {\displaystyle \alpha } ), for every function f : P κ ( A ) P κ ( A ) {\displaystyle f:P_{\kappa }(A)\to P_{\kappa }(A)} , if f ( X ) X {\displaystyle f(X)\subseteq X} for all X P κ ( A ) {\displaystyle X\in P_{\kappa }(A)} , then there is some B A {\displaystyle B\subseteq A} such that { X f ( X ) = B X } {\displaystyle \{X\mid f(X)=B\cap X\}} is stationary.[3]

Magidor obtained a variant of the tree property which holds for an inaccessible cardinal iff it is supercompact.[4]

See also

References

  • Drake, F. R. (1974). Set Theory: An Introduction to Large Cardinals (Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics; V. 76). Elsevier Science Ltd. ISBN 0-444-10535-2.
  • Jech, Thomas (2002). Set theory, third millennium edition (revised and expanded). Springer. ISBN 3-540-44085-2.
  • Kanamori, Akihiro (2003). The Higher Infinite : Large Cardinals in Set Theory from Their Beginnings (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN 3-540-00384-3.

Citations

  1. ^ A. Kanamori, "Kunen and set theory", pp.2450--2451. Topology and its Applications, vol. 158 (2011).
  2. ^ Magidor, M. (1971). "On the Role of Supercompact and Extendible Cardinals in Logic". Israel Journal of Mathematics. 10 (2): 147–157. doi:10.1007/BF02771565.
  3. ^ M. Magidor, Combinatorial Characterization of Supercompact Cardinals, pp.281--282. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 42 no. 1, 1974.
  4. ^ S. Hachtman, S. Sinapova, "The super tree property at the successor of a singular". Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol 236, iss. 1 (2020), pp.473--500.