Appeal to pity

Type of logical fallacy

An appeal to pity (also called argumentum ad misericordiam, the sob story, or the Galileo argument)[1][2] is a fallacy in which someone tries to win support for an argument or idea by exploiting one's opponent's feelings of pity or guilt. It is a specific kind of appeal to emotion. The name "Galileo argument" refers to the scientist's suffering as a result of his house arrest by the Inquisition.

Examples

  • "You must have graded my exam incorrectly. I studied very hard for weeks specifically because I knew my career depended on getting a good grade. If you give me a failing grade I'm ruined!"
  • "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, look at this miserable man, in a wheelchair, unable to use his legs. Could such a man really be guilty of embezzlement?"

See also

Notes

  1. ^ "Appeal to Pity". changingminds.org.
  2. ^ "Appeal to Pity (the Galileo Argument)". Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. Retrieved 6 October 2012.
  • v
  • t
  • e
Common fallacies (list)
Formal
In propositional logic
  • Affirming a disjunct
  • Affirming the consequent
  • Denying the antecedent
  • Argument from fallacy
  • Masked man
  • Mathematical fallacy
In quantificational logic
  • Existential
  • Illicit conversion
  • Proof by example
  • Quantifier shift
Syllogistic fallacy
Informal
Equivocation
Question-begging
Correlative-based
Illicit transference
Secundum quid
Faulty generalization
Ambiguity
Questionable cause
Appeals
Consequences
Emotion
Genetic fallacy
Ad hominem
Other fallacies
of relevance
Arguments
  • Category
Authority control databases Edit this at Wikidata
International
  • FAST
National
  • Germany
  • Israel
  • United States