Argumentum ad crumenam

Informal fallacy

An argumentum ad crumenam argument, also known as an argument to the purse, is the informal fallacy of concluding that a statement is correct because the speaker is rich (or that a statement is incorrect because the speaker is poor).

The opposite is the argumentum ad lazarum.

Examples:

  • "If you're so smart, why aren't you rich?"
  • "This new law is a good idea. Most of the people against it are riff-raff who make less than $20,000 a year."
  • "Warren Buffett is hosting a seminar. This seminar is better than others, because Warren Buffett is richer than most people."

References

  • v
  • t
  • e
Common fallacies (list)
Formal
In propositional logic
  • Affirming a disjunct
  • Affirming the consequent
  • Denying the antecedent
  • Argument from fallacy
  • Masked man
  • Mathematical fallacy
In quantificational logic
  • Existential
  • Illicit conversion
  • Proof by example
  • Quantifier shift
Syllogistic fallacy
Informal
Equivocation
Question-begging
Correlative-based
Illicit transference
Secundum quid
Faulty generalization
Ambiguity
Questionable cause
Appeals
Consequences
Emotion
Genetic fallacy
Ad hominem
Other fallacies
of relevance
Arguments
  • Category
  • v
  • t
  • e
Extreme wealth
Concepts
People
Wealth
Lists
People
Organizations
Other
Related
Philanthropy
Sayings
Media
  • Category
    • by country


Stub icon

This logic-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e