Diagnostic peritoneal lavage

Surgical diagnostic procedure
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage
Other namesDiagnostic peritoneal aspiration
ICD-9-CM54.25
MeSHD010533
[edit on Wikidata]

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) or diagnostic peritoneal aspiration (DPA) is a surgical diagnostic procedure to determine if there is free floating fluid (most often blood) in the abdominal cavity.[1]

Indications

This procedure is performed when intra-abdominal bleeding (hemoperitoneum), usually secondary to trauma, is suspected.[2] In a hemodynamically unstable patient with high-risk mechanism of injury, peritoneal lavage is a means of rapidly diagnosing intra-abdominal injury requiring laparotomy, but has largely been replaced in trauma care by the use of a focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST scan) due to its repeatability, non-invasiveness and non-interference with subsequent computed tomography (CT scan). Abdominal CT and contrast duodenography may complement lavage in stable patients, but in an unstable or uncooperative persons, these studies are too time-consuming or require ill-advised sedation. Magnetic resonance imaging is extremely accurate for the anatomic definition of structural injury, but logistics limit its practical application in acute abdominal trauma.[3][4] The procedure was first described in 1965 by Hauser Root.[5][6]

Procedure

After the application of local anesthesia, a vertical skin incision is made one third of the distance from the umbilicus to the pubic symphysis. The linea alba is divided and the peritoneum entered after it has been picked up to prevent bowel perforation. A catheter is inserted towards the pelvis and aspiration of material attempted using a syringe. If no blood is aspirated, 1 litre of warm 0.9% saline is infused and after a few (usually 5) minutes this is drained and sent for analysis.[7]

Interpretation of results

If any of the following are found then the DPL is positive and operative exploration is warranted:[8]

  • 10 cc/blood
  • 100,000 RBCs/mm3
  • 500 WBCs/mm3
  • Presence of bile, bacteria or food particle
  • Amylase level > 75 IU/mL
  • Bilirubin level > 0.01 mg/dL
  • ALP > 2 IU/L

See also

  • Peritoneal washing

References

  1. ^ Rosen 2009, p. 22
  2. ^ Rosen 2009, p. 422-4
  3. ^ Tintinalli JE, Kelen GD, Stapczynski JS (2004). Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide, ed 6. McGraw-Hill. pp. 1615–1616.
  4. ^ Townsed CM Jr, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, et al. (2008). Sabiston Textbook of Surgery: The Biological Basis of Modern Surgical Practice, ed 18. Saunders. pp. 502–504.
  5. ^ Jagminas, Liudvikas (June 18, 2012). "Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage". Medscape. Retrieved December 31, 2012.
  6. ^ Root H, Hauser C, McKinley C, Lafave J, Mendiola R (1965). "Diagnostic peritoneal lavage". Surgery. 57: 633–7. PMID 14295771.
  7. ^ Kim, Dennis(Narrator) (July 17, 2012). Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage (DPL). San Diego: "The Division of Trauma/Surgical Critical Care/Burns is part of the Department of Surgery, UC San Diego Health System. Event occurs at 4:00. Archived from the original on 2021-12-19.
  8. ^ Andrew B., MD Peitzman; Andrew B. Peitzman; Michael, MD Sabom; Donald M., MD Yearly; Timothy C., MD Fabian (2002). The trauma manual. Hagerstwon, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 0-7817-2641-7.

Bibliography

  • Rosen, Peter; John J. Ratey MD; Marx, John A.; Robert I. Simon MD; Hockberger, Robert S.; Ron Walls MD; Walls, Ron M.; Adams, James L. (2010). Rosen's emergency medicine: concepts and clinical practice. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby/Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-323-05472-0.
  • v
  • t
  • e
Tests and procedures involving the human digestive system
Digestive system surgery
Digestive tract
Upper GI tract
SGs / Esophagus
Stomach
Medical imaging
Lower GI tract
Small bowel
Large bowel
Rectum
Anal canal
Medical imaging
Stool tests
Accessory
Liver
Gallbladder, bile duct
Pancreas
Abdominopelvic
Peritoneum
Hernia
OtherClinical prediction rules
  • v
  • t
  • e
Principles
Assessment
Clinical prediction rules
Investigations
Management
Principles
Procedures
Pathophysiology
Injury
Mechanism
Region
Demographic
Complications