Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc.

1968 United States Supreme Court case
Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc.
Argued March 13, 1968
Decided June 17, 1968
Full case nameFortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc.
Citations392 U.S. 390 (more)
88 S. Ct. 2084; 20 L. Ed. 2d 1176
Case history
Prior377 F.2d 872 (2d Cir. 1967)
Holding
Receiving a television broadcast does not constitute a "performance" of a work.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Abe Fortas · Thurgood Marshall
Case opinions
MajorityStewart, joined by Warren, Black, Brennan, White
DissentFortas
Douglas, Marshall, and Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc., 392 U.S. 390 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that receiving a television broadcast does not constitute a "performance" of a work.[1]

In 1968, the United States Copyright Office called this case "the most important American copyright case of the 1960s."[2]

References

  1. ^ Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc., 392 U.S. 390 (1968).
  2. ^ Abraham L. Kaminstein. 71st Annual Report of the Register of Copyrights (PDF) (Report). United States Copyright Office. Retrieved August 19, 2018.

External links

  • Text of Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc., 392 U.S. 390 (1968) is available from: CourtListener  Google Scholar  Justia  Library of Congress  Oyez (oral argument audio) 
  • v
  • t
  • e
U.S. Supreme Court Article I case law
Enumeration Clause of Section II
Qualifications Clauses of Sections II and III
Elections Clause of Section IV
Origination Clause of Section VII
Presentment Clause of Section VII
Commerce Clause of Section VIII
Dormant Commerce Clause
Others
Coinage Clause of Section VIII
Legal Tender Cases
Copyright Act of 1790
Patent Act of 1793
Patent infringement case law
Patentability case law
Copyright Act of 1831
Copyright Act of 1870
Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890
International Copyright Act of 1891
Copyright Act of 1909
Patent misuse case law
Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914
Lanham Act
Copyright Act of 1976
Other copyright cases
Other patent cases
Other trademark cases
Habeas corpus Suspension Clause of Section IX
No Bills of Attainder or Ex post facto Laws Clause of Section IX
Contract Clause of Section X
Legal Tender Cases
Others
Compact Clause of Section X


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e