United States v. Corson

1885 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. Corson
Decided May 4, 1885
Full case nameUnited States v. Corson
Citations114 U.S. 619 (more)
Holding
After the President has dismissed an officer of the United States from service, the former officeholder cannot be restored to his form position by the President's subsequent revocation of the order of dismissal if the initial appointment required the advice and consent of the Senate.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Morrison Waite
Associate Justices
Samuel F. Miller · Stephen J. Field
Joseph P. Bradley · John M. Harlan
William B. Woods · Stanley Matthews
Horace Gray · Samuel Blatchford
Case opinion
MajorityHarlan, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 2

United States v. Corson, 114 U.S. 619 (1885), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court concerning the Appointments Clause.

References

External links

  • Text of United States v. Corson, 114 U.S. 619 (1885) is available from: Cornell  Justia 
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
United States v. Corson
  • v
  • t
  • e
United States Appointments Clause case law
Appointment of Officers
Officers vs. Employees
Inferior Officers
Recess Appointments
Challenges to Appointments
Appointments by Congress
Removal of Officers
Limits on Removal Power
Removal by Congress
Jurisdiction stripping
Ratification
  • FEC v. NRA Political Victory Fund (1994)


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e